A parent wrote on Reddit to let others know that they would only pay for their child’s wedding if certain conditions were met, but now the payments have stopped because the parents’ youngest child has rejected the conditions. There is.
The parent’s piece (which does not specify gender) has received nearly 4,000 reactions so far, with more than 1,300 people already commenting just hours after it was posted.
The parent asked others on social media platforms, “AITA paid for my eldest son’s dream wedding, but not my second son’s.” [wedding]since she doesn’t [meet] What are my two conditions? ”
Reddit user defends man who told ‘overwhelmed’ wife to do more housework
On Tuesday, on a subreddit known as AITA (“Am I the a–hole”), a user named “Hot- Explain9228” wrote, “I’m going to pay for all of my kids’ weddings.” Ta.[s] If two conditions are followed. ”
According to officials, the condition is that “the venue must be wheelchair-friendly.” [And] they must invite the whole family [members] unless there is [there is] extreme reason. Everything else is fine, I’ll pay for the wedding. ”
” [wedding] The venue is in the mountains and is not wheelchair accessible,” a parent wrote on Reddit about the wedding one of their children was planning. (St. Petersburg)
But this time the parents encountered a problem. Rather, the problem lies in the daughter getting married.
“My brother’s wedding was about $40,000, so I [paid] For everything,” the parent wrote.
“Last week, she let me know that she had found a venue and was looking for a down payment.”
Currently, the parents continued, “My youngest son is planning a wedding, and he communicated the conditions at the time of the engagement.”
Reddit user urges man to divorce wife because ‘psychic’ interfered with marriage
The Reddit writer continued, “Last week she informed me that she had found her own venue and was looking for a down payment. The venue is in the mountains and is not wheelchair accessible.” continued.
“I told my daughter today that I would not pay because the venue was in violation of the original conditions. This is where the argument started,” said one person, regarding a disagreement over the wedding that became a hot topic within the family. the parent wrote on Reddit. (St. Petersburg)
The parent continued, “The roads were dirt, the doors weren’t big enough; [there are] lots of stairs. When I contacted the venue, almost nothing was available. [those with] hindrance. ”
So the parent knew all of this and said, “I told my daughter today that I’m not going to pay her because the venue is violating the original terms.” This is where the argument started. .
“We have several family members who use wheelchairs.”
The parent wrote, “She thinks I’m stupid; [that I’m] I’m playing my favorites.i reminded her [there] That was a condition for me to pay, but she didn’t abide by it. ”
Reddit woman confused by boyfriend’s negative reaction to care package: ‘An ungrateful man’
The parent edited the post to say, “To be clear, we have multiple family members who use wheelchairs. [Thus, the] Wheelchair rules. ”
Fox News Digital reached out to the Reddit poster for further comments and updates.
“It’s perfectly fair that you don’t pay. It’s also perfectly fair that she picks the place and pays for it herself. Do you understand?” (St. Petersburg)
Meanwhile, many writers have expressed their opinions on the situation.
“Obviously someone needs access. Are you all just ablisters?” wrote one commenter in the “upvote” comment at the top of the post.
Another commented: “It’s perfectly fair that you don’t pay. It’s also perfectly fair that she picks the place and pays for it herself. Do you understand?”
Reddit user accused of spoiling young son for invitation to girls-only event
The original poster responded to the comment by saying, “That’s fine. saves money, actually. We will not fund anything that excludes families. ”
The same parent who was the original poster added, “I will not fund any part of a wedding that excludes people.”
Another commenter asked the original poster a series of questions.
- “Have you asked her what plans she has for families who could not attend due to poor transportation?”
- “Was she going to skip rule number two and not invite these people?”
- “Did you hope they wouldn’t come once they found out where the venue was?”
- “Maybe she doesn’t care if they come because she’s not close to these people?”
- “Why does she think you are the favorite when these rules apply to her brothers too and they are not broken? Don’t you know why their wedding was paid for?”
The original poster replied, “She didn’t have the answers…”
Click here to sign up for our lifestyle newsletter
Replying to the original post, another wrote: “It seems like you were very clear on your terms and your daughter decided not to abide by them… You’re playing favorites. In the worst case scenario, I think it’s a condition.” [on] Although it is a gift, there is nothing to complain about considering how generous it was and the conditions are out of the ordinary. ”
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
The same commenter added, “On the other hand, I think your daughter is being very rude. I can understand if she had a problem with the second condition. Because sometimes you don’t want someone who just did it,” he added. [to] Once or twice in my life, at a wedding. But the problem is the first condition.
“It seems like they’re trying to exclude people with disabilities. It’s really disgusting.”
For more lifestyle articles, visit www.foxnews.com/lifestyle..
