If you thought the flood of studies and data showing that COVID-19 vaccinations have caused devastating levels of excess deaths would cause the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to reconsider, think again. The CDC has recommended more vaccinations for all age groups and will continue to recommend them for one simple reason: money.
On June 27, the CDC Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices Unanimously recommended This fall, it recommended that children 6 months and older be vaccinated against both COVID and the flu. The vaccines are ineffective and dangerous for all ages, yet are recommended for children who were not previously at risk, years after the pandemic is over. The committee ignored safety and efficacy concerns and focused only on the expiration of the CDC’s Bridge Access Program, which funds free vaccinations for children.
Venture Socialism is great. These guys really know how to play the game.
How on earth can the committee be so insensitive to the danger and ineffectiveness of this shot at this stage in the game?
Why didn’t anyone voice their concerns? Shocking new research A study comparing German states by mortality and vaccination rates found “no beneficial effect” of COVID vaccination at the community level, and that “the increase in excess mortality was greater the more vaccinations were administered within a state.”
Why is there no one new Italian studies Is there research showing that “the overall risk of death in people who received the first and second dose of the vaccine was even higher than in unvaccinated people, and that booster vaccinations were ineffective”?
Why New Korean ResearchDidn’t a study that found a 22.5% increase in Alzheimer’s disease and a 238% increase in mild cognitive impairment in vaccinated people compared to unvaccinated people cause even a little alarm in these leading medical figures?
Follow the money.
In May, the Department of Health and Human Services Announced Eight new members appointed to ACIP, doubling the current membership of the group that approves vaccine recommendations. Informed Consent Action Network discovered All eight new members have direct financial interests in vaccine manufacturers.
For example, the committee’s new chair, Dr. Helen Talbot, has received more than $425,000 in research funding from Sanofi, which makes some of the main influenza vaccines as well as several key injectable drugs in the childhood immunization schedule, including for whooping cough and meningitis.
Dr. Edwin Asturias, an infectious disease specialist at Children’s Hospital Colorado, has received millions of dollars in research funding from various vaccine companies, including Pfizer and GlaxoSmithKline, the two makers of the dangerous RSV vaccine.
The other four members, Dr Yvonne Maldonado, Dr Noel Brewer, Dr Helen Chew and Dr Albert Shaw, have received funding from Pfizer or GSK. Is it really surprising that these members voted in favour of further doses of a vaccine that is widely regarded as dangerous and ineffective?
Money talks, data and science move the needle.
The entire HHS vaccine promotion and approval apparatus is a den of vipers populated by the manufacturers themselves, all the while immunizing them from all responsibility. The British Medical Journal FDA leaders have been proactive in telling employees they are free to work for the manufacturers they just regulated. Here’s what BMJ editor Peter Doshi discovered about one employee who worked on COVID vaccine development and is now with Moderna.
During his last three years at the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), physician-scientist Doran Fink focused on reviewing COVID-19 vaccines. But 10 years after joining the FDA, Fink took a job with COVID-19 vaccine manufacturer Moderna Inc., fulfilling his FDA retirement obligations. Upon moving to private industry, FDA ethics program staff emailed Fink “tailored” guidelines regarding post-employment restrictions.
Emails obtained by the BMJ through a Freedom of Information request explained that while US law bans many types of lobbying contacts, it “does not prohibit other activities of former employees, including working ‘behind the scenes'”.
Moderna recently Approved RS virus mRNA vaccine and $176 million contract To develop an avian flu vaccine. Does anyone think Moderna would be turned down by these gatekeepers?
The revelations are even more concerning following a U.S. Supreme Court ruling last month. Murthy v. Missourigovernment censorship lawsuit. The majority opinion made it impossible for citizens to sue HHS officials who work with big tech companies to censor people who raise concerns about vaccine safety. Now we know these officials are in the pockets of the vaccine manufacturers. We fund the research and marketing of dangerous products, pay government bureaucrats to censor critical information, and approve these vaccines and make them mandatory for school attendance!
Venture Socialism is great. These guys really know how to play the game. The question is, what are Republicans doing in Congress when, more than three years after the COVID vaccine debacle, the same bad actors continue to approve dangerous mRNA vaccines? They will continue this farce just because they can.
