House Republican leaders are blocking a proposal to roll back a controversial provision that gives intelligence agencies the power to spy on vast numbers of U.S. companies in support of government espionage efforts.
In April, Congress reauthorized Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), a controversial surveillance law that targets foreign adversaries. But they also often conduct surveillance on American citizens without a warrant.
The Act incorporates a provision known as the Electronic Communications Service Provider (ECSP) definition. expanded Types of businesses and service providers that can compel “other service providers with access to equipment that is or may be used to transmit or store wired or electronic communications” to support the program.
The dramatic expansion of ECSP set off alarm bells.
Privacy advocates denounced it as a “Trojan horse” for Patriot Act 2.0.
Mark Zwillinger, a top FISA expert and one of the FISA court amici, writes that any American company can have its communications wiretapped by its landlord.
Despite these exclusions, the new amendments would still allow the government to compel the assistance of a wide range of additional entities and individuals in conducting surveillance under FISA 702. The broad scope of the new definition is evidenced by the fact that the drafters felt compelled to exclude commonplace locations such as senior centers, hotels, and coffee shops. However, these specific exceptions are within the scope of the new definition. It's not a “narrow” change.
…
Additionally, even if the possibility of the same surveillance were eliminated, U.S. companies could still have their communications intercepted (if one is in a foreign country) by a landlord who has access to office wiring or the data center where the computers are located. It also means having sex. With the help of hotels, restaurants, community centers and other public retail facilities. See below for a specific hypothetical example of how this monitoring might occur. Previous blog posts.
Former attorney general Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Missouri) said in April that the FBI has proven unworthy of having more powers to surveil Americans given its history of mistreatment of Americans. he claimed.
However, despite widespread concerns about this provision, the Senate moved to pass the FISA reauthorization bill due to time constraints on passing the Section 702 reauthorization bill. Sen. Mark Warner (D-Va.), chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, has promised to fix the obvious problems with this definition in a separate intelligence bill in 2024.
As Congress winds down for the holiday season, lawmakers are trying to slip the intelligence bill into the must-pass National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA).
The Senate version of the intelligence bill included an amendment that would limit the definition of ECSP to cloud computer servers, rather than the unlimited number of companies that may have to assist government spies.
of new york times reported House Republican negotiators say they are pushing for the amendment to redefine ECSP to be removed from the NDAA. House Republicans, who have the power to decide what goes into the defense bill, include Speaker Mike Johnson (R-Louisiana), House Armed Services Committee Chairman Mike Rogers (R-Ala.), and House Intelligence Committee Chairman Mike Turner. (Republican, Ohio).
Spokespeople for each government agency did not respond. times. A spokesperson for Mr. Warner's office said that Mr. Warner was determined to amend the provision “whether this Congress or the next.”
The ESCP definition is intentionally vague to make its purpose clear to foreign adversaries. times He pointed out that the motive was the FISA court's confidential opinion. said The law's original definition did not include cloud servers.
House Republican leadership's opposition to the NDAA's ECSP amendment raises questions about whether the leadership intends to extend Section 702 to more Americans, businesses, and service providers.
Speaker Johnson's office is asking whether Mr. Johnson supports removing the ECSP amendments in the NDAA, or if the Speaker supports Section 702 applying to more Americans, businesses, and service providers than Speaker Turner. He did not respond to a request for comment on whether he wanted to. Or so Mr. Warner argued at this year's FISA debate, given that the amendments are specifically scoped to extend the FISA court opinion cited by Mr. Turner and Mr. Warner.
Speaker Turner's office did not respond to a request for comment on similar language.
The best chance for privacy advocates, both inside and outside Congress, to address this provision will likely be in mid-2026, when Section 702 expires again. Many of these advocates said reforms to address this issue are urgently needed.
Bob Goodlatt, former House Judiciary Committee chairman and senior policy advisor at the Privacy and Surveillance Accountability Project (PPSA), told Breitbart News in a written statement:
The bill was passed because it guaranteed that this very broad power would be curtailed. Promises to fix it were made and accepted in good faith, but those promises have been broken by advocates of increased public scrutiny. Unless Congress changes course, Americans' data will be The Wi-Fi and servers of millions of small businesses, from fitness centers to department stores, small office complexes, and even churches and other houses of worship, will be subject to warrantless searches. If we do so, our country will truly transform into a thoroughly surveillance state. I don't think the next Congress or the new administration will welcome that. [Emphasis added]
“RISAA's current definition of electronic communications service provider (ECSP) is too broad, encompassing any service provider, not just communications service providers, and expanding the scope to tens of thousands of entities. This is unacceptable. As a result, Congress should take advantage of the opportunity to correct this overly broad definition in the NDAA.” Cherniavsky, senior policy analyst at Americans for Prosperity, told Breitbart News.
“Senators agreed to vote in favor of this provision based on the Senate Intelligence Chairman’s promise that it would be amended in subsequent legislation. Now, House leaders are retroactively unraveling that deal. “We're trying to do that,” said Elizabeth Goitein of the Brennan Center for Justice at New York University School of Law.
Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) said, “If that amendment doesn't pass and the incoming administration abuses these sweeping new FISA powers…who didn't see that coming?” “I don't think you can claim that,” he said.
Sean Moran is a policy reporter at Breitbart News. Follow him on X @SeanMoran3.
