South Africa, South Africa, has defended its new land exposition law on Monday on the criticism of President Donald Trump.
Playing card announcement On Sunday, all the United States will help South Africa may be stopped by law. signature By Ramafosa, which makes the government easier to expure land.
“South Africa has confiscated land and handles people in a specific class very terribly. It's a bad situation that the radical left media doesn't want to mention.” I said On Sunday on his true social platform.
“At least, large human rights infringements are happening by everyone. The United States does not support it, we will act, and until the complete survey of this situation is completed. Is to block all the funds to South Africa!
Trump repeated these criticisms to reporters on Sunday night. “A terrible thing is happening in South Africa. Leadership is doing some terrible things, doing terrible things,” he said.
“They are taking the land, taking their confiscation land, and in fact they are doing much worse than that,” he said.
Ramafosa office Responded By defending a new exposement method and promising protection means to prevent abuse.
“South Africa is a constitutional democracy that is dominant, justice, and equally rooted, and the South African government has not confiscated land,” said the South African Presidential Office.
“The recently adopted exposement method is not a means of confiscation, but a constitutional legal procedure that guarantees public access to land in a fair and fair way led by the Constitution.” I continued.
“South Africa always had a statement of expenditures that balance the public use of land and the protection of the rights of property owners, like the United States and other countries,” said the President. 。
The African National Council of Ramafosa (ANC) accused Trump spread the incorrect information from the right -wing lobbyist group called “Africa Fallam”.
“President Trump's recent tweets, the incorrect claims of Africa Formation of Land Confirmed, are direct efforts to misunderstand global communities and protect land ownership patterns in the apartheid era. It is a result. ” I said on monday.
“Africa Fallum has established a position as an advocacy of white minority privileges by using a fear atmosphere to weaken the South African constitution and legal land reform programs. The campaign is not about justice, it is about blocking economic transformation and maintaining a repreated status. “
Mubarara has defended the expenditure as “a fair constitutional mechanism aimed at reversing historic confiscation of land.”
“By making incorrect information, they do not understand the democratic process of South Africa, but encouraged those who quickly make racist stories. Afriforum is a sovereign domestic country. He said that it is not acceptable to continue to seek external interventions.
The Democratic Alliance, the largest opposition in South Africa, was critical of several rules of the Applications Law, but claimed that Ramafosa signed the law without compensation.
Another major South African party, the left end Open and racist discriminator Economic free warriors (EFF) jumped into the dispute by absolutely claiming the expenditure. Do Allow Arbitrary deployment without compensation, and use it in that case that “threats do not stop us” EFF gaining power.
New South Africa law SuperSedes The 1975 expenditure was demanded that the government pays to the owner of the expanded land. The revised law states that the land can be taken without compensation when the government feels “fair, fair and public interests.”
“The expenditure may not be exercised, unless the expenditure has attempted to reach an agreement with the owner,” said Ramafosa's spokesman Vincent Mugwenia.
EFF has a very vast idea of the seizures of “fair and fair” property. Even ANC complains that black South Africans do not own enough farmland 30 years after the collapse of apartheite. They can solve them by forced redistribution of property.
“The tendency of land inequality and the use of some greedy individuals to hinder national development will be the past.” Declared After a new expenditure law is signed by the law.
Some of the critics of the expritality law are afraid that the government will not redistribute. sufficient Using land, instead of using its extended power, the government wants various projects, rather than giving black citizens farmland.
Other critics were worried that the threat of Arbitrary -intended confiscation would scare foreign investors. This is a danger that you may have arrived early thanks to Trump's comments as a South African bond and stock market. slump on monday.
The new expenditure method was a law for a few weeks, so how many of the weekend discussions did it? Ready You will be abused. It was also unknown which South Africa would be interrupted by Trump. The United States has a total of $ 440 million, from economic development to health programs, and has funded many South African programs.
Joe Biden, the predecessor of Trump Considered South Africa's fund reduction, but for another reason: the Biden administration was angry that the Ramafosa government was approaching Russia too much. The administration ultimately decided not to act on a proposal to pause foreign assistance.
