WSJ Mischaracterizes Vance Russia Comments Ahead of MSC

February 14, 2025

President Trump looks forward to fundamentally productive negotiations between Putin in Russia and Zelensky in Ukraine, Vice President JD Vance in comments falsely characterized by the Wall Street Journal as a threat to war I stated.

US Vice President JD Vance speaks at the Security Conference in Munich. This took place a day after it was said to be a terrorist attack in the city, and today I am meeting with Ukrainian President Voldy Milzelensky. I'll talk Wall Street Journal Before these involvement, Vance conveyed President Donald Trump's determination to cooperate in peace in Ukraine and the table incentives for Russia to cooperate.

WSJ It appears that they seriously misunderstood the conversation as radically fundamentally belligerent, but this was quickly dispelled on Friday morning. Vance's team has released a transcript Peace is a priority as the actual interview shows Trump's position that no one will take the president's choice while he stepped into negotiations.

Breitbart News understands that the team, with JD Vance, is furious at WSJ's framing of conversations with the paper.

The expanded quote revealed what VP Vance said WSJ That: “There is absolutely no tool for pressure. Looking at President Trump's approach to this, there are a wide variety of options, and there are economical leverage tools. Of course, leveraged military tools. What we can do is There are a lot, but I think basically the president wants to negotiate productively with both Putin and Zelensky.”

Original Belligerent Interval WSJ Framing was recognized by the Kremlin, but there were several attempts to moderate accordingly. Putin's spokesman Dmitry Peskov says the story surprised him and Russia tried to clarify what he and Russia actually meant in a talk between Moscow and Washington.

Vance's broader comment means that if it is expressed fairly, many plates will spin in the Russian invasion of Ukraine and many people will solve the solution by solving some problems. Be clear about the fact that there is, that the new US administration is awake. Either. Among them in particular are the potential future reality that may not be able to fully return to the borders of the 1990s. This is the perspective Pete Hegses announced to Breitbart News this week, and that he must return to Western clubs to prevent Russia from becoming fully subordinated to China, and G7 membership is the peace agreement. It recovered later.

“Being the brother of the alliance with China is not in Putin's interest,” says Vance, who said he said about his upcoming work on kicking Moscow out of Beijing's orbit, which was once considered a victory for the American cold. The reported war foreign policy was lost under President Biden.

According to a transcript released by his team, “I think it was very clear that the president didn't like the idea of moving Ukraine to NATO. He was very clear about it. Also, I think the president is very clear whenever he is negotiating, everything is on the table.”

Ukraine's “sovereign independence” appears to have been after the future peace agreement is naturally a major concern for Ukrainians, and their President Zelensky has spent a lot of energy in recent months, and Ukrainian needs It makes clear that it is not a “freezing” conflict, Russia can return to the next day after feeling that it has fully rebuilt its troops to deal with the blow of killing. Peace must be the final thing. It means Ukraine, in Zelensky's eyes, is deterrently large enough to place the concept of invasion from Putin's heart forever.

This could mean a “million” human army, Zelensky said this was robbed of the future, not just the Ukrainian army, but the major “contingents” of the Allied countries. Ta. Meanwhile, that could mean that Ukraine would regain its nuclear weapons – in the 1990s, it abandoned its enormous weapons in exchange for guarantees of its sovereignty through a Budapest memorandum – Zelensky has suggested several times recently .

While this may seem fanciful at first, US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegses did not dismiss the idea from an exclusive comment on Breitbart News this week. . He said: “That's the president's job. He is a leader, a master negotiator and a deal maker. Some of us have set out certain types of conditions that could make trading more possible. I'm there to help you set it up.

At Ukrainian borders, Hegses made clear his proposal that in exchange for peace parts of Ukraine would remain under Russian control, calling it a return to the pre-2014 border “unrealistic.” I did.

Editor's Notes 14/02/25: This story has been revised to better reflect the statements of VP JD Vance, as his team revealed after the WSJ article was published.