National Intelligence Universitythe Crudge organization disguised as an institution of higher education is likely to be an organisation that sowed some of the busy National Security Agency's bozos. Sexting instead of decrypting. As All 18 US intelligence agencies Send medium-term caregiver staff (civilians and military) to the NIU for continued education can bet that at least some of the major exporters of extremist day nonsense that have been established in the NSA and elsewhere were NIU graduates.
The government's Efficiency Bureau is required to visit the NIU campus (in fact, only one building) in Bethesda, Maryland. Institutions need thorough reviews – not necessarily to eliminate them, but to reduce their most ineffective parts and personnel. The goal is to improve the quality of our graduates with a focus on meaningful instruction.
NIU is as dysfunctional as the broader American higher education system. It doesn't have to be like this.
Executive Vice President of NIU; Patricia A. Larsen,We have actively expanded our DEI initiative, ignoring the strictness of common sense and academics. Her approach often places student sensitivity to effective instruction at the expense of faculty and staff. God forbids any guidance from disrupting the feathers of our sensitive and sensitive intelligent community! As a result, the quality of both incoming intelligence agents and alumni has declined sharply.
Since 1992, I have lectured at NIU and its predecessors: the Defense Intelligence Election College, the Joint Military Intelligence Information College, and later at the National Defense Intelligence Election College. Over the years I have witnessed a significant decline in student quality and academic preparation.
In 2021, when the Director of the National Intelligence took control of the university, the institutions adopted a bloated sense of importance (with no doubt input from the CIA). ODNI lacked a clear university plan and had little understanding of its curriculum. This mismanagement, coupled with a shift towards imitation of private higher education practices, seriously undermines NIU standards.
Now, we want to emulate prestigious schools like Harvard and Virginia Tech, but in reality it resembles military staff and community colleges.
NIU's current approach includes LAX student-centric learning policies that can influence what students are being taught. Entrance standards have dropped sharply. Colleges no longer require a GRE score and accept almost everyone who applies. Many students and alumni suffer from basic writing skills, such as forming consistent sentences with appropriate subject matter and language agreement. Grade inflation has been ramped and the 4.0 GPA is now standard.
Today, NIU attracts government eDu-crats, which rely on PowerPoint slides rather than effective teaching methods. It also became a degree factory for students who have no writing or reasoning skills. In the past, I have reviewed their uncategorized papers and papers. It consisted of sentences fragmented on slides written in text message shorthand.
The university staff is also bloated, and is composed primarily of non-faculty members trying to mimic large state universities. This is absurd considering that NIU student organizations are smaller than many medium-sized high schools. The entire department has contributed nothing to the university's core mission. It is to provide high quality graduate level education in strategic intelligence.
Worse, NIU management has long focused on increasing the number of graduates, not generating fewer but prepared intelligence experts, regardless of their capabilities. Searching the public course catalog will not reveal any ethical instructions. The emphasis on quality quantities risks destroying the entire intelligence community.
This lack of standards may help explain to the Intelligence Reporting Agency why hundreds of people, like the National Intelligence Director, fired from the National Security Agency last week, fired them using a classified system to exchange indecent messages with shewd. If NIU implements higher standards in reading, writing, reasoning and ethics, it may develop graduates who have graduated from the integrity, discipline and dedication that once defined both military officers and intelligence agents. Sadly, this doesn't seem to be the case today.
As a result, NIU is as dysfunctional as the broader American higher education system – and for the same reason. It doesn't have to be like this.
Doge and Gabbard must take critical action to clean up the NIU. After Gabbard's quick move to fire NSA employees involved in fraud, it becomes clear that the bold steps will have consequences.
To prevent further decline in the intelligence news community, Doge and Gabbard should conduct a thorough review to eliminate unnecessary activities and staff positions that do not directly contribute to effective education. The focus of NIU should return to preparing the next generation of intelligence professionals with the skills needed for the arts and crafts of intelligence work.
