More than 100 Democrats voted against a resolution led by House Republicans, which condemned terrorism related to recent attacks in Boulder, Colorado. The measure passed with a vote of 280-113. Interestingly, 75 Democrats sided with Republicans in support of it, while six lawmakers—five Democrats and one Republican—opted for a “present” vote.
This resolution was introduced by Rep. Gabe Evans in response to the attack that occurred last week. However, Democrats expressed their concerns, indicating that the language in the resolution felt politically motivated. They argued that, alongside condemning the attack, the resolution seemed to place blame on so-called Blue Sanctuary jurisdictions that conflict with federal immigration policies.
Democrats pointed to the case of Mohammed Sabri Soliman, who was involved in approving tourist visas followed by work permits, raising concerns about the vetting process for individuals from countries not complying with their visa terms.
The resolution emphasized the need for open communication between state and local law enforcement and their federal counterparts, suggesting that such communication is vital for public safety. It also expressed gratitude towards law enforcement, including immigration and customs officials, for their efforts to ensure security.
This situation has amplified tensions in Democrat-controlled cities like Los Angeles and Nashville, where leaders have critiqued the Trump administration’s tactics against immigration enforcement. In fact, the administration’s approach to dealing with protests against ICE in Los Angeles has faced significant backlash, particularly from Democratic officials calling for the National Guard to intervene in the demonstrations.
House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries remarked negatively on Evans’ resolution, stating, “Who is this guy? He has no serious interest in the fight against anti-Semitism in America. This is not a serious effort.” He went on to describe anti-Semitism as a tragedy that shouldn’t be weaponized for political advantage.
Evans addressed the criticisms via X, asserting his background in law enforcement and expressing that the hostile reactions towards him from Democratic leaders contribute to the ongoing issue of anti-Semitism.
Rep. Dan Goldman, who identifies as Jewish, also took issue with Evans’ resolution, saying, “You weren’t here, Mr. Evans, last semester – but there were about ten anti-Semitic resolutions that effectively said the same thing just to score political points. We Jews are sick and tired of being pawns.”
In contrast, Rep. Jeff Van Drew supported Evans, noting that his actions, which included condemning anti-Semitism, were valid and relevant to a broader discussion about violence against innocent victims.
This report is still developing, and more updates will follow.
