SELECT LANGUAGE BELOW

New Jersey attorney general: Nationwide bans are still an option after Supreme Court decision

NJ attorney general: Universal injunctions still possible after Supreme Court ruling

New Jersey Attorney General Comments on Supreme Court Ruling

On Monday, New Jersey Attorney General Matt Platkin discussed the implications of the recent Supreme Court ruling, which went against certain expectations surrounding the President Trump’s policies. Despite the setback, he suggested that there could still be an opportunity for a sweeping legal measure to counteract those policies.

In an interview with CNN’s Kate Bolduan, he emphasized, “The Supreme Court recognized the significant harm we are facing as a nation. It’s possible for the state to still require national relief.” He pointed out that the impacts on the state are considerable and that the lower courts have been asked to take this into account.

The court delivered a decisive 6-3 ruling along ideological lines, rejecting a judicial hold that had previously hindered the President’s agenda since he took office again in January.

Judge Amy Coney Barrett remarked that these so-called “universal injunctions” are likely beyond the authority granted to federal courts by Congress. She asserted that judicial overreach could encroach upon the powers designated to the President.

The ruling instructed lower courts to reevaluate the injunction and act “swiftly” in line with the Supreme Court’s decision.

Platkin expressed his belief that there may still be instances where a universal injunction could be justified. He described the ruling as “rhetorically strong,” yet rather moderate regarding the administration’s overall intentions.

The case that prompted the court’s decision revolved around an executive order from Trump aimed at restricting birthright citizenship for children born in the U.S. to immigrants. However, the court did not delve into the actual merits of birthright citizenship.

“It’s essential to acknowledge what the Supreme Court did not decide on Friday,” Platkin noted. “They didn’t make a ruling on the substance of birthright citizenship. For over 150 years, it has been clear that children born on American soil are considered citizens, a principle established since the Civil War.”

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Reddit
Telegram
WhatsApp

Related News