Reflecting on Freedom and Church Security
This week, countless Americans engage in celebrations, from fireworks to family gatherings, honoring the sacrifices made by our forebears for our freedom.
The Declaration of Independence, ratified by 56 signatories, was far more than a list of grievances; it was a formal declaration of war. Among the signers was John Witherspoon, a Presbyterian pastor and the sole clergy member to do so. However, many religious leaders across the colonies supported the fight for independence, lending spiritual support to their congregations as they stood firmly against British authority.
It’s curious—many churches promote the religious freedoms outlined in the First Amendment, yet don’t actively defend the second amendment rights necessary for self-protection.
The ideas surrounding self-governance and defense weren’t entirely new; they were embedded in Protestant thought. Hence, from this rich Protestant tradition, America was established.
Nevertheless, contemporary sermons often shy away from discussing these themes. In many congregations, there’s a noticeable silence about the threats they face, particularly concerning the erosion of Second Amendment rights in various states.
But an even graver concern maybe lurking; the reality of armed threats targeting places of worship.
The Necessity of Church Security Teams
Every church should implement a security team.
In a world envisioned as ideal—where the only “arms” needed on a Sunday morning are spiritual—parents could let their children roam freely without fearing a violent intrusion. In such a place, safety would be the standard, not an exception.
Yet reality reveals a different picture. Despite the civic duty to safeguard places of worship, churches often remain vulnerable. The current climate sees active threats and state policies that can hinder self-defense.
Take, for instance, the recent near-tragedy at Crosspoint Community Church in Wayne, Michigan. A man attempted a mass shooting. Thanks to brave actions from a deacon who delayed the attacker, trained church security personnel ultimately intervened. However, the fact that such incidents are becoming almost routine should be a wake-up call for religious leaders.
This isn’t isolated; many churches face such grim realities.
Even though churches are taking proactive measures by organizing security teams, they often find themselves penalized by insurance companies, sometimes facing up to a 20% increase in premiums. For smaller congregations, such financial pressures can be overwhelming.
In contrast, hiring an off-duty police officer could cost anywhere from $60 to $75 per hour, a sum manageable for larger megachurches with substantial budgets, but quite prohibitive for average congregations trying to balance their finances.
The obstacles extend beyond insurance; government policies can serve as barriers, too. For instance, in Colorado, a recent bill categorized churches as “sensitive spaces,” which would restrict concealed carry rights unless specific exemptions were granted—these requirements were often revoked or varied significantly across counties.
This legislative environment effectively ties the hands of churches wishing to enable self-protection within their communities.
Similar laws are popping up in other states, like California, New York, and Illinois, signaling a troubling trend—disarming responsible individuals and limiting churches’ ability to shield their members.
Steps the Church Can Take
First and foremost, it’s crucial to recognize that mental and physical safety go hand in hand.
Some well-meaning ministers hesitate to address self-defense out of concern that it detracts from their spiritual mission. But protecting one’s neighbors is a fundamental act of love. A good shepherd safeguards their flock against all types of danger, including physical threats.
In fact, promoting the presence of a security team might even enhance the appeal of the church community, rather than deter visitors.
The Bible does not shy away from addressing safety. Nehemiah was active in rebuilding Jerusalem’s walls, wielding a sword in one hand while working with the other. Additionally, Jesus spoke to his disciples about the need for self-protection (Luke 22:36).
Churches should take pride in their right to defend their members. As our ancestors recognized, there’s no spiritual rationale for neglecting our capacity to protect our communities. Just as congregations advocate for religious liberties, they need to stand for their right to self-defense as well, including engaging with lawmakers and organizing community efforts against unconstitutional laws.
It’s notable that while many congregations celebrate the freedoms laid out in the First Amendment, they often do so without the same vigor for Second Amendment rights.
Moreover, it’s vital to honor those who serve in these roles. Every week, dedicated individuals quietly observe the congregation, vigilant in their preparedness while others focus on worship. These people aren’t paranoid; they are protectors, committed to ensuring safety.
Churches should confront the reality of their surroundings with courage. Communities of faith ought to be sanctuaries of peace, not because they ignore threats, but because they are prepared.
Living in a troubled world doesn’t necessitate ignorance or complacency. God doesn’t bless foolishness. The Church has a mission to guide souls with truth but must also care for the physical well-being of its members.
Ignoring real threats goes against the very essence of Christ’s incarnation. His ministry was both spiritual and tangible—he fed the hungry, healed the sick, and lived among us in flesh and blood. Our approach as a church should reflect this holistic care.
We nurture our spirits through teachings while also defending our bodies. Both are acts of love.
