SELECT LANGUAGE BELOW

Against women wearing pants | Blaze Media

Without absolute virtue, conservatism is a relative ideology. Only the latest tolerance criteria try to save.

It is an act of drawing a line in the sand. When the liberal sect manages to “wash” the rows, conservatives “redraw” the rows everywhere that they feel the most painful.

The woman fought to wear pants, but it wasn't because his pants looked beautiful.

You can see this in the cross dress.

One century ago, it was considered a “cross dressing” where women wear pants. no longer.

In the other day, I think that conservative Christians wear dresses as “cross dressings”. In fact, I think there is even the concept of “cross dressing”.

Pants suitsunation

This is why I believe this.

In the United States, it was thought that women wearing men's clothes was wrong, so wearing pants in public until 1923 was not legal for women (and vice versa).

This idea was influenced by the poem of the Old Testament's poetry 22: 5. “

The belief that pants are male codes follow the 21st century.

The first woman in the White House for portraits was Hillary Clinton in 2004. The first woman in the Senate wore the pants was 1989.

Nevertheless, the woman was not allowed to wear pants on the U.S. Senate floor until two female Senator in 1993 rebelliously wore pants and forced the rules in the second half of the year. 。

Women, funerals, weddings, and courts are still considered inappropriate, but this is not the truth. Many airlines did not delete women's uniform requirements from 2012 to 2016. The Jesus Christian Church, Saints, only began to allow female missionaries to wear pants in 2017.

Switch the problem

The “battle” wearing pants has been pushed out mainly by feminist personality. Nevertheless, many women do not avoid wearing dresses if both liberal and feminists can help themselves.

These women are usually most angry with the idea that wearing pants is essentially masculine. They may claim that such concepts are outdated. In particular, pants are cut in the style of women complementing the body of a woman. (Probably for them, I have never found jeans to flatten my waist.)

They may claim that there is nothing like cross dressing in a strange kind of “Gotcha”. “Dress code” for men and women changes according to time and location.

There are other (non -west) cultures where women wear pants. The man was wearing a tunic. Not only that, men wore racing, high heels and makeup, but they are all women now.

However, the woman did not fight for the right to races and high heels.

Pants' EN desire

The woman fought to wear pants, but it wasn't because his pants looked beautiful. The woman was like a man and wanted to wear something worn by a man. Liberal women do not acknowledge this. This simply offends a conservative woman who wants to judge a man when wearing clothes.

Even today, if women want to see more feminine, she reaches out to the dress. If she feels like a “Omba Musume”, or if she just wants to be “practical” or “simple” and she doesn't want to show her a woman, she wears pants. Masu.

In essence, we all know that pants are like that do not have Like Queen Lee or Princess.

The most interesting thing about how fashion has changed is how the default neutral clothing has changed. The femininity was once a default neutral gender, but men wore excessive fashion statements. The baby was wearing a gown (female).

Currently, default neutral gender clothes are masculine, and babies wear sleepers (male) instead of gowns (women). If the default was “robe” for everyone, it was now a “pants” for everyone. There may be things that women should not be wearing in the past, if they do not want to blame him as “cross dressing” where women should not have once.

You can claim that this is the result of progress. Fashion change. Expectations for various gender have changed. Perhaps this is not a bad thing, but if only men are at risk of crossdress, but all women wear are more than accusations, it will be a complicated problem.

The same conservative woman who thinks she doesn't do anything to wear jeans is very angry at the appearance of a man in a dress. For now.

Unless we are completely returning to femininity, we speculate that it is normal to wear anything that men want, as women are already doing, and there is nothing like cross dressing.

Perhaps the first step is to refuse the biggest lie feminism sold by women. Its femininity is compact or restricted. We do not refuse it, but find the true strength to accept our women.

I put my sons in my pants and my daughter in a dress. The difference between men and women is given by God and transcends the times. I believe in choosing clothes that reflect this.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Reddit
Telegram
WhatsApp

Related News