Hello, readers.
I’m not usually one to get swept up in grand conspiracies. They always feel too big—too many people involved is the issue. Generally, it seems to me that when secrets exist, there are often more than just a handful of folks who are aware of them.
Just think about historical leaks. For instance, we’ve learned how nuclear weapons are created— that information got out. There was a leak regarding Russia’s reconnaissance aircraft flight ceiling. And the unsettling instances of government-sanctioned LSD experimentation on soldiers or syphilis treatments given to African American men were all revealed eventually. Look at Hillary’s supposed conspiracy with Russia; it started to unravel right from the outset. It took a while, sure, but now, after some time, I think I have a clearer picture of it all.
So, I don’t believe what I’m about to describe is a conspiracy. It wasn’t some secret plan hatched by a select group.
In my view, it’s more about a pervasive, chaotic influence. Different groups begin to form their own ideas. It’s less about who leads major investment banks; they will continue to operate in their own entrenched ways regardless.
Then we have the New Left and the final strategy they implemented to test how much power it truly holds…
transgender trojan
Most people, even those who haven’t encountered George Orwell’s “1984,” recognize its pivotal message, symbolized by the absurd claim: 2 + 2 = 5.
I call this pivotal because it reflects a concerning reality. A tyrannical government wanted its citizens to accept nonsensical beliefs instantly. The core intent was conversion, particularly towards loved ones—like partners or family members.
Big Brother didn’t just want to control thought; it aimed to wield power over personal relationships.
Some of you may recall a certain scene where Winston has a rat cage strapped to his head. He’s willing to state and accept any notion, but how far will he go to betray his closest bonds for Big Brother?
—
A man named Chase Strangio suddenly altered his viewpoint.
Previously, this ACLU attorney, renowned for spearheading legal actions related to transgender issues—especially concerning children—strongly advocated for absolute authority. Books should be banned. He suggested that those who err should face imprisonment or extreme poverty. Parents ought to lose the right to make choices about their children’s health care unless…
Well, unless they’re compliant with the machine’s demands—like “affirming” their child’s beliefs and taking consequential actions. When a confused child insists on irreversible medical procedures…
These parents must willingly engage in decisions that endanger their children. Anything less could result in social ostracism, job loss, or worse—parents learning they’ve lost all authority and that the state exercises control over their children.
—
It’s somewhat poetic, if not downright ironic, that the distressing issue of institutionalized child treatment reached a breaking point post-coronavirus.
During lockdown, many of us said and did regrettable things. I don’t care what arguments are presented now; we all stumbled in various ways. For instance, I was living in Northern Virginia and, honestly, hardly went outside for two whole years.
I would have preferred to go out more, but everything in D.C. was closed—jobs, gyms, basically anything you can think of.
When I traveled to Hawaii, I got vaccinated legally. Sure, I could’ve gotten a fake vaccination card, but I thought, what’s the harm?
So, I ended up on a six-hour flight, wearing a mask alongside hundreds of others. We were trapped in this massive tube with masks on.
Honestly, that felt more irrational than following a silly six-foot sticker on the ground to the checkout line.
If it had been a test, I would’ve probably flunked. But I never once believed any of it genuinely meant anything. In fact, I was frustrated throughout.
What annoyed me even more was realizing that, for some individuals—perhaps those with their own struggles—adhering to the nonsensical seemed almost religious. Yet in today’s world, it’s not everyday you see someone, even a devoted follower, publicly calling out others as “sinners.”
But that’s precisely what happened in this instance, and it wasn’t a stranger—it was someone at the register who firmly instructed, “Put your mask over your nose.”
—
Strangio engaged in a conversation with Ross Douthat from the New York Times.
If you’re curious about the undercurrents within this topic and how a significant, dictatorial turn in radical leftist ideologies evolved, you can find the expansive article elsewhere.
For now, here’s what caught my attention.
Douthat mentioned claims from several contrarian doctors advocating for a “wait and see” approach concerning gender dysphoria. They argue this often leads to what’s termed “giving up”—when a young individual uncomfortable with their identity eventually comes to accept biological reality as they hit adolescence.
A lot of research backs this idea, hence, Strangio’s ideas have been labeled as taboo.
That’s the root of why it gets framed as “conversion therapy,” and anyone who endorses it faces being labeled a “transphobe.”
Strangio’s admission here feels like a subtle concession, but it’s significant nonetheless.
He’s open to having a “conversation,” even realizing it could lead to his own undoing. At this point, it seems clear that minors shouldn’t undergo irreversible medical treatments, even with parental approval.
So, aside from special cases, it appears they might have lost that battle.
—
Now, let me share why I see this as an important win.
For the New Left, mere distortion of reality wasn’t enough. They needed to impose absurdity upon you—making you assert crazy things. Joe Biden is perfectly fine. The border crisis? No issue there. That person dressed up? They’re actually a woman.
They wanted you to act out that absurdity. Wear a mask. Stand six feet apart in crowded spaces. Get booster shots of experimental vaccines.
Force it on children, even when there’s ample evidence showing they are not endangered. Just get those shots!
Moreover, they sought not only to disrupt but to do so at the expense of children, leading to permanent alterations that impact their bodies for life. It was a scheme pushing dependency on pharmaceuticals like Pfizer, often up until the end of their lives.
They tried to impose this through sheer force. The state became a safe haven for minors whose parents failed to “affirm” them. They threatened legal battles that could stretch on for years.
Like Winston, strapped with a rat cage, we could hear tales of loyalty being put to the test as he shouted, “Do it to Julia! Do it to Julia! Not me! Julia!”
Ultimately, all this left me surprised because I’d hoped that genuine concern was directed toward children. In reality, it was about the adults. Wearing a mask was trivial. They sought to push boundaries with the most ridiculous actions that would jeopardize our own kids. The ultimate evidence of control lay in making people act against their better judgment. It felt crucial that should they have succeeded, it would have signaled the loss of American spirit.
But there is a glimmer of hope; many in our society recognized the agenda behind the so-called transgender Trojan horse and collectively rejected it. Some may have bought into it, but many did not.
My parents stood firm. Educators, students, athletes, family, and peers all collectively asserted, “No, we’re not going along with that.”
Now, the movement’s most fervent advocate, essentially the Grand Inquisitor, humbly approaches the lone religious conservative at the New York Times, cautiously requesting a “dialogue.”
We might have set the horses on fire.
what i am reading
Turley remains straightforward, and there are details that merit attention.
Jonathan Turley highlights federal developments regarding the J6 pipe bomber suspect as an intriguing point.
—
It’s astounding that NBC would collaborate with foreign entities to censor American conservatives.
Foreign leader detained for orchestrating efforts to suppress right-leaning media in the U.S.
—
Does Jake Tapper genuinely believe all black men are named Daquon or something?
Jake Tapper mistakenly identifies the J6 bombing suspect as ‘white’.
