Democratic politicians are armed over the Trump administration's decision to freeze federal funds despite a court order from John McConnell Court in Rhode Island.
McConnell accused the administration of accusing him of continuing funding against the Jan. 31 order in response to lawsuits filed by Democratic lawyers in 22 states and in Washington, D.C.
“They obviously stepped over their boundaries, but unlike the other two branches, they “not the strength” to realize their seizing.
The judge argued that the Trump administration “continued to inappropriately freeze federal funds and refused to resume payments of allotted federal funds.”
On Monday, McConnell ordered the administration to comply with previous orders.
“As the courts have discovered, the widespread scope and drastic freeze of federal funds are probably unconstitutional and continue to cause irreparable harm to a vast portion of the country,” the district judge wrote. Ta.
Democratic politicians and businesses media This week, the Trump administration's actions wereConstitutional crisis. ”
But neither Democrats nor their media allies have expressed such concerns in the past when left-wing politicians ignored, and even in some cases blatantly ignored court orders.
1. Biden buys votes on student loan scheme
In June 2023, the Supreme Court denied former President Joe Biden's presidential federal student loan “forgiveness” plan, declaring it unconstitutional. The initiative eliminates the $10,000 debt of individual borrowers earning less than $125,000 a year and is married to couples with less than $250,000 a year. An additional $10,000 would have been zero for the Pell Grant borrowers.
The plan cost US taxpayers about $430 billion.
The Supreme Court justice held that the Biden administration had surpassed its authority in its unconstitutional student loan debt cancellation plan.
Additionally, two reports from the government's Office of Accountability found that Biden's student loan cancellation program automatically approved borrowers without proper screening and failed to implement fraud protection safeguards.
Despite the Supreme Court ruling and the GAO findings, the Biden administration has decided to proceed with its pledge to cancel federal student loan obligations.
The administration has deployed a series of similar, small initiatives.
February 2024, Biden pride About his attempts to avoid the Supreme Court decision.
“Early in my term, I announced a major plan to provide debt relief to millions of working families against university student debt,” he said. “Ten millions of debts were literally about to be cancelled in debt. But my Magazine Republican friends in Congress, elected officials, special interests intervened and sued us. And The Supreme Court blocked it.”
“But it didn't stop me,” Biden declared. “We have announced that we will pursue alternative paths for student debt relief for as many borrowers as possible.”
2. Biden's CDC tramples on property rights in the COVID era
In 2020, Congress passed it Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act“a 120-day moratorium on eviction applications, as well as other protections for tenants in certain rental properties with federal support or federally related funding.”
When Congress chose not to extend the suspension, the Biden administration's Centers for Disease Control and Prevention tried to intervene. order Evictions that included widespread use of all housing property in the country and imposed criminal penalties on those who violated the order.
Congress has extended the CDC order to the month further. However, if that expired, the agency issued a second extension. Originally scheduled to expire in March 2021, the extension has been extended multiple times, with the final expiration date set in July 2021.
In June 2021, the Supreme Court considered the CDC's order and ultimately allowed it to survive as it was expected to expire in a few weeks, allowing Congress time to distribute rental assistance funds .
But Judge Brett Kavanaugh I wrote it“I agree to the district courts and applicants that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has surpassed existing statutory authorities by issuing a nationwide eviction moratorium.”
He noted that Congress needs to expand further.
Biden's CDC ignored the court's opinion and issued another order in August 2021, attempting to expand its expired eviction moratorium into community housing “Substantial” and “High” levels of Covid-19 transmission. However, the order was blocked by the Supreme Court.
Again, the judge I wrote it“The CDC exceeds its authority.”
“If Congress specifically approves the lawsuit taken by the CDC, that would be one thing. But that wasn't happening,” the order read.
3. Bucks County Democrats promise to count illegal votes
Democrat Bucks County Commission Chairman Dian Ellis Marseglia said she would count illegal votes in a Pennsylvania Senate race between incumbents Bob Casey (D) and Dave McCormick (R) in November. He boasted that he had planned.
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court ordered that dates and false and false mail-in ballots cannot be counted.
Ellis Marsegria said he plans to count votes despite the court's orders.
“People are always violating the law,” she said. “So if you violate this law, it's because you want the court to pay attention. There's nothing more important than counting the votes.”
After Ellis Marsegria's comments, the state's Supreme Court ordered a second time that such votes could not be counted.
The blowbacks of the fierce community have urged Ellis Marsegria to quickly back up her previous comments. She claimed that her words were out of context.
She issued what appeared to be a half-baked, dishonest apologies, claiming that many were unaware that she was referring to a temporary vote rather than by mail.
Many Bucks County residents attended subsequent committees to request the immediate resignation of Ellis Marsegria.
Ellis-Marseglia was elected in 2007 and remains on the board of directors.
4. Mayor of Sanctuary protects illegal aliens
In President Donald Trump's first administration, he issued an executive order in January 2017.Increase public safety within the US“It wanted to prevent the sanctuary jurisdiction from hindering federal immigration enforcement measures.
As part of Trump's enforcement actions, he sought to withdraw federal funds from jurisdictions that failed to comply with immigration laws.
“To the fullest extent of the law, it is an administrative policy to ensure that the state's political subdivisions comply with 8 USC 1373.” “In promoting this policy, the Attorney General and Secretary will receive federal grants to jurisdictions that knowingly refuse to comply with 8 USC 1373 (the sanctuary jurisdiction) to the extent consistent with the law. We guarantee that you are not qualified unless deemed necessary by the Attorney General or Secretary for law enforcement purposes.”
8USC§1373 State, “Notwithstanding any other provision of federal, state, or local governmental agencies or civil servants may not be prohibited or in any way restricted by government agencies or staff. Immigration and Naturalization Services Information regarding the legal or illegal citizenship or immigrant status of an individual.
Additionally, federal, state, and local laws prohibit the exchange of immigration status information from “other federal, state, or local government agencies.”
In 2003, immigration and naturalization services mentioned in the law were split Three Federal Agency: US Citizenship and Immigration Services, US Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Customs and Border Protection.
Trump's executive order withholding federal funds from the sanctuary jurisdiction faced many legal challenges during his first term, and the court blocked it. But the sanctuary city was order 8To comply with USC §1373.
Anyway, Chicago, New York City and many other cities continue to protect illegal aliens from federal immigration agents.
5. Cuomo attacks religious freedom
In October 2020, Democrat, New York Governor Andrew Cuomo took strict lockdown measures, claiming to stop the spread of Covid-19.
Heavy-hand restrictions limit the capabilities of churches in Brooklyn and Queens, experiencing high infection rates at the time. The so-called “red zone” churches were prohibited from hosting more than 10 participants, but the “orange zone” was limited to 25.
Cuomo's executive order urged several religious groups – the city – of Brooklyn's Roman Catholic parish and two Orthodox Jewish congregations.
Rabbi David Zwiebell of Agdas, Israel, USA Called The restrictions are “very devastating to the community of faith.”
The lawsuit argued that Cuomo's restrictions discriminated against religious practices, while increasing the capacity limits of so-called “essential” businesses. The group further argued that the First Amendment protected their religious freedoms.
US Supreme Court Domination 5-4 Benefits religious organizations.
Cuomo responded by calling the ruling “unrelated.”
“The zone they were talking about was already a controversy, so it has nothing to do with practical implications,” he said. “I think this was really an opportunity for the courts to express their philosophy and politics.”
Enforcement department under siege
Democrat leaders have invested a considerable amount of time and effort to stop Trump's first administration, and his second term has already been shaped to follow a similar pattern.
An attempt has been made block Trump's executive order to end birthright citizenship. Federal judge on Tuesday order After filming offline CDC and FDA websites and removing references to radical gender ideology, the administration restored it. Congressional Democrats also tried to delay confirmation of Trump's cabinet candidate.
These actions paint a picture of administrative agencies fighting the growing trends in invasion by other branches of the government.
Giancarlo Canaparro, a senior legal fellow at the Edwin Meese III Center for Legal and Justice Studies at the Heritage Foundation, told Blaze News, “The US government no longer respects the separation of powers its founders had assumed.”
“On the other hand, Congress inappropriately gives executives legislative powers, while the other judge often interferes with the proper authority of the executives,” Canapalo said. “I hope Congress will regain legislative power from the President and allow the President to use his enforcement power from unconstitutional detention.”
Daniel Horowitz, host of the Blaze Media Podcast, “Conservative Review with Daniel Horowitz,” told Blaze News, “A court that dictates that Democratic presidents must have information on their website about ascetic education. “There's no way to tolerate this.”
“The courts govern ordinary civil and criminal cases. They do not have a wide range of policies on issues affecting the entire population, and are not able to set up budgets, personnel decisions, personnel decisions that data staff can access; and does not determine how they can run the website.'' Horowitz continued. “They obviously sorted their boundaries, but unlike the other two branches, they “do not do that either” to realize their seizing. ”
“Democrats are already cultivating the basis for demonstrating how helpless a judge is to decide political decisions, and Trump should apply the same standards. What will be next? Horowitz says Added.
Like Blaze News? Bypass censorship, sign up for our newsletter and get stories like these directly into your inbox. Sign up here!
