SELECT LANGUAGE BELOW

Colorado Democrats: State can save money by funding abortion, killing 30% more babies

That's what Colorado Democrats do. More than I'm happy Blowing taxpayer money into programs for illegal aliens. But when it comes to reporting on American mothers and their unborn babies, they clearly resort to deadly ways to reduce spending.

State Democrats are on the way law It enforces the right to abortion in the state constitution. Colorado Health Policy and Funding will require program participants to be funded using taxpayer dollars in addition to abortions for Medicaid and Child Health Plans. Forces civil servant insurance plans to fund abortions for plan members.

Senate Bill 183 – The results of Colorado voters' overwhelming support last year Correction 79set the stage for the use of public funds for abortion. The state Senate was passed in a 22-12 party affiliated vote on March 12th.

Before the bill Pass The Health and Human Services Committee on Tuesday showed Colorado House speaker Julie McCluskey (D), the law's leading sponsor, could save the state a little by using taxpayer funds to kill babies.

“That saving comes from a avoided birth that doesn't occur because abortions happened instead,” McCrusky said. I said With videos shared with social media. “So childbirth is more expensive than abortion. Therefore, savings come to Medicaid births that don't occur.”

“This bill actually reduces costs for the healthcare policy and funding sector, both this year and out. Approval Last year, by Planned Parenthood.

“Abortion care services represent one-off spending.”

A Colorado House speaker showed that the state would first see a “increase to $1.5 million in general funds,” but over time, the elimination of taxpayer-subsidized human life will ultimately lead to “cost cuts.”

McCluskie was referring to a State financial analysis It made the following assumptions and claims:

  • 333,330 women ages 15 to 44 will be enrolled in Medicaid or Children's Health Plans and Programs between 2025 and 2026.
  • 1.67% of the members of this cohort seek abortion each year.
  • 50.4% of abortions are “procedural” and 49.6% are chemo abortions.
  • “The abortion procedure is expected to be refunded at a rate of $1,300, and medication abortion is expected to be refunded at a rate of $800.”
  • Taxpayer-funded abortion via Medicaid/CHP+ increases the number of fetuses killed by 30%. and
  • The average birth repayment cost is $3,850 and is funded by state and federal programs.

Democrats' calculations suggest that abortion will not only save the total reimbursement cost of the total reimbursement costs for child delivery, but also have to address the additional costs that may arise in connection with people who have not been able to “avoid life.”

“While Medicaid-covered births usually include additional effects on the child's social safety net, abortion care services represent one-off expenditures. These effects are not addressed in this financial memo,” the Financial Notes for SB 183 states.

“On the net, the bill will reduce HCPF costs around $286,000 in 2025-26 and $573,000 in 2026, and ongoing, according to the fiscal notes. “These effects are the ultimate result of increased costs for abortion services and reduced costs due to recovered births.”

State Senator Kenneth G. Degraf (R) Tweet“Holy Man's Disgust, Batman!” Killing people is cheaper than caring for them.”

“Paying for abortion for low-income women will save millions of dollars in our state by being “evade-born,” I wrote it Republican state Rep. Brandy Bradley. “Margaret Sanger will be very proud.”

Like Blaze News? Bypass censorship, sign up for our newsletter and get stories like these directly into your inbox. Sign up here!

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Reddit
Telegram
WhatsApp

Related News