The European Union is already on its way to becoming its own federal superstate, but it may need to develop its own nuclear deterrent “on the way to a European army”, says a top German lawmaker. .
European Parliament member Katarina Barley, leader of Germany’s ruling Social Democratic Party (SPD), said President Trump responded to Russian aggression in eastern Europe and said Europe must do more to protect itself in line with the requirements of the NATO treaty. sent a clear signal. She suggests that the time for nuclear weapons may have come.
He spoke to a German liberal-centrist newspaper. Der Tagesspiegel barley said The certainty of the “US nuclear umbrella” over Europe is fading, and as a result, the European Union’s nuclear weapons “could become a problem midway through the deployment of European forces.”
European leaders and Trump comment on NATO: “Serious but not literal”: Times of Londonhttps://t.co/Ih5tLMidsI
— Breitbart London (@BreitbartLondon) February 12, 2024
Given Russian President Vladimir Putin’s interest in Poland and Lithuania, “this shows how vigilant we have to be,” she said, adding that if the U.S. were to go to war in Ukraine, Overwhelmed by fatigue, he said Europe would have to do so if it stopped supplying weapons to Kiev. Intervene.
Before Brexit, when Britain left the continental sphere of influence, there were two nuclear-armed states in the EU. Only France remains, with 290 warheads.. Additionally, European countries Belgium, Germany, Italy, and the Netherlands receive and train U.S. nuclear weapons through the NATO nuclear sharing program. Its aircraft can carry and launch U.S. nuclear weapons, but only with U.S. permission, making the system an extension of U.S. programs through NATO rather than an independent deterrent.
Expanding nuclear weapons to more countries is fraught with legal difficulties, especially because of the 1968 Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, which absolutely prohibits this. surely, Several countries condemned Russia He said last year’s deployment of some nuclear weapons to ally Belarus was a violation of the treaty and that there were practical problems for Europe to do the same.
Russia claims that by giving Belarus the ability to launch nuclear weapons from aircraft on its behalf, it is simply doing what the United States did, for example, by integrating its bombs into the German Air Force. did. However, the U.S. nuclear sharing program predates the Non-Proliferation Treaty by many years, making it “grandfathered” by the time it was signed.
European leaders launch new ammunition factory to meet Ukraine’s war needshttps://t.co/3rcDxH2qVb
— Breitbart London (@BreitbartLondon) February 12, 2024
Needless to say, there is opposition within the country. For example, Germany currently has a very anti-nuclear stance and has shut down all its nuclear power plants in the midst of an energy crisis. This was because the political imperative to release clean nuclear energy was greater than ensuring that national needs were met. Loss of imported gas from the Russian Federation.
Burley’s reference to a “European Army” refers to euro-federalism, the label given to European politicians who work to transform the European Union into a federal superstate and elevate individual member states into a larger whole. It refers to a decades-old dream by the European Union that the EU would become something like this. You will eventually command a single continental army, navy, and air force. Critics cite the violation of national sovereignty and the inefficiency of adding another layer of command to NATO’s already well-functioning chain of command, and the problem of Britain being repulsed by such a military force is , was one of the many arguments that drove the 2016 Brexit vote.
Ironic warning: NATO can’t be ‘a la carte’, says diplomat critical of Trump as nation performs worsthttps://t.co/ofyqH5tc6u
— Breitbart London (@BreitbartLondon) February 12, 2024
