After a shooting spree in Austin, Texas that lasted close to 24 hours and resulted in four people being injured, a former police officer criticized left-leaning city council members for “handcuffing” the police by removing essential capabilities.
Authorities apprehended three teenagers—aged 15, 16, and 17—on Sunday. The incidents included 12 separate shootings that appeared to be random attacks, even targeting fire stations.
The youngest suspect remains unnamed due to their juvenile status, while Cristian Mondragon Fajardo, the 17-year-old, is the only one publicly identified because he can be held criminally responsible under Texas law. Reports indicate that the suspects had prior warrants related to firearms theft from a local store. Notably, one of the younger teens allegedly stole guns from the same store just a day earlier.
Fajardo will face multiple charges, including aggravated assault with a deadly weapon and theft of a firearm, among other offenses.
Dennis Farris, a former Austin officer and current president of the Austin Police Retired Officers Association, noted that last weekend’s events illustrated the challenges posed by the city’s stripped resources. He highlighted how the Austin Police Department could have benefited from technology that was taken away last year.
“At some point, the police department was utilizing advanced technology,” Farris explained. He expressed frustration over the council’s decision to eliminate tools like facial recognition software and license plate readers. Until the previous year, Austin Police used services from Flock Safety for such tools, but activist groups successfully campaigned against them.
Critics of such technology often raised concerns that local governments might share data with federal immigration authorities, potentially leading to the detention of undocumented individuals. However, Farris mentioned that Austin police rarely interact with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).
Amid this, he argued that the activists, often vocal in council meetings, played a significant role in the decision to remove the resources. He characterized many council members as far-left figures who prioritize obstructing police work over public safety.
Farris referenced an incident where a suspect could have been caught earlier with the right technology in place. He urged the City Council to stop political posturing and to equip the police with necessary tools to maintain safety in Austin.
Mayor Kirk Watson acknowledged in a media briefing that license plate readers would have likely assisted during the chaotic events of the weekend. He pointed out the recent passage of the TRUST Act, designed to regulate the use of surveillance technology while ensuring transparency and privacy for residents. The Act will permit cities to use public safety technology under certain conditions.
Watson emphasized the urgency of equipping law enforcement effectively, stating, “We must ensure that law enforcement has the tools to make this possible.” City Councilman Mark Duchesne echoed this sentiment, acknowledging the Police Department’s prompt actions and asserting the necessity of providing police with the means to prevent future incidents.
Duchesne insisted on the importance of utilizing systems capable of preventing serious crimes while also safeguarding residents’ privacy. Fox News Digital reached out for comments from the City Council and the Austin Police Department.





