Fauci’s Diary Sparks Controversy Over COVID-19 Origins

Critics of Anthony Fauci have long asserted that he was aware of more about the origins of the coronavirus than he publicly acknowledged. A recent release of his diary entries seems to bolster those claims.

Senator Rand Paul (R-Ky.) has shown strong support for this perspective. He faced significant pushback during hearings but made valid points regarding gain-of-function research, according to comments made by Blaze TV host Stu Bruguiere.

Stu, along with co-host Dave Landau, expressed their agreement with Paul and emphasized their discontent regarding Fauci’s actions during the pandemic. They believe his decisions harmed American children by restricting social interactions for an extended period. Dave remarked that Fauci’s influence could have inadvertently contributed to issues without needing vaccines.

For instance, he noted that children in the Northeast faced school closures lasting up to a year and a half, a sentiment that Stu echoed. Dave went on to recount his intense feelings toward Fauci, stating, “Oh, I hate this guy. I’m sorry, I really do.” He referred to Fauci’s controversial experiments involving beagles, emphasizing a desire for accountability.

Senator Paul also shared insights from his investigation into Fauci, mentioning a discrepancy between Fauci’s personal notes and public statements. Notably, an entry dated January 26, 2020, revealed Fauci’s assertion that the pandemic was not caused by a market but rather an “amplifier.” This contradicts his previous claims about a natural origin.

Further entries from February 1, 2020, indicated that only two out of twelve scientists believed the virus was of natural origin; the majority suspected deliberate insertion. “The lab leak theory. That’s what it is,” Stu remarked, reflecting on these revelations.