Convicted felons could soon be released from prison and spill onto California’s already crime-ridden streets, thanks to a law ratified by Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom in September 2020. There is.
Manhattan Institute Fellow and Essayist Heather Mac Donald
I got it. In Monday’s Wall Street Journal, AB 2542, the so-called California Racial Justice Act“All felons serving sentences in state prisons and jails will be able to retroactively challenge their convictions and sentences on the basis of systemic bias.”
“To win a case, an inmate must prove that the police officers, prosecutors, judge, and jury in his case were racially motivated, and that his case was unfair. “There is no need to show that,” MacDonald wrote. “If you can prove that criminal suspects of your race have been sentenced more frequently or more severely than members of other racial groups in the past, you can be entitled to a new trial and sentence. right.”
Around the time of ratification, Newsom
was suggested Democratic Rep. Ash Kalra’s AB 2542 said California has proven it is “committed to leading the nation in confronting and addressing systemic injustice.”
The governor’s office further stated that AB 2542 is a “countermeasure to address the widely criticized 1987 precedent established by the United States Supreme Court.”
McCluskey vs. Kemp. ”
The left apparently thinks a precedent has been set.
McCleskey It says it is problematic because it “has the functional effect of requiring criminal defendants to prove intentional discrimination when challenging racial bias in legal proceedings.”
The governor’s office says the requirement to cite actual evidence is a “high standard that is nearly impossible to meet.”
California’s 2020 law instead “establishes a new state cause of action that simply presumes that the judicial system is biased, avoiding the need to show an individual’s discriminatory intent,” McDonald said. wrote.
AB 2542 amended the state’s criminal code to allow a convicted person to challenge a conviction if they can prove:
- Everyone involved in the case, including the judge, attorneys, police, and jurors, “exhibited bias or hostility toward the defendant because of the defendant’s race, ethnicity, or national origin.”
- Even in the absence of “intentional discrimination,” “race, ethnicity, or national origin contributed to the exercise of peremptory dissent.”
- The defendant faced more severe charges or convictions than similarly situated defendants of other races or national origins.or that
- Prosecutors “more frequently sought and obtained convictions for more serious crimes against people” related to the defendant’s race or national origin.
In practice, this can help free felons or help criminal suspects avoid greater responsibility.
russell austin indicted
deadly slash Erika Johnson, a 25-year-old pregnant woman, killed her unborn child. Mosby is the leader of a robbery-prostitution ring who was previously convicted of multiple murders. It is taking for the gang-related murder of Darryl King Divens.
Both Austin and Mosby, who face the death penalty in Riverside County, filed the challenge under California’s Racial Justice Act to avoid a “death penalty eligible” jury.
claim Black defendants were 14 times more likely to receive a death sentence than white defendants in similar cases.
MacDonald pointed out that the racial comparisons advanced in such matters can hide important details.
“If defense experts seek to prove that defendants of one racial group have received harsher sentences in the past than defendants of other races, ignore criminal history in constructing the comparison group. ,” McDonald wrote. “He can ignore the heinousness of the crimes committed by these two groups. As long as both groups are charged under similar statutes, they are sufficiently comparable to make a case for prosecutorial racism.” It will be considered that there is.”
Despite the obvious potential for abuse, Claudia Van Wyk, senior staff attorney at the ACLU Death Penalty Project, said:
was suggested In January, he said easing the amputations of murder suspects like Austin and Mosby due to recognition of “systemic racial bias” is “exactly how California’s Racial Justice Act was intended to work.” “This is the way to do it.”
MacDonald stressed that the plan, which defense attorneys are already rushing to exploit, “will create unequal justice for victims as well as criminals.”
“Racial disparities in prosecution and sentencing mirror disparities in criminal offending,” the Manhattan Institute fellows noted. “In Los Angeles, blacks are 21 times more likely to commit a violent crime, 36 times more likely to commit robbery, and 57 times more likely to commit murder than whites, according to police department data.”
McDonald emphasized how this data is disproportionately the result of reports from Black victims and witnesses.
Ultimately, victims like Erica Johnson and Darryl Kingdivens may be denied justice in the name of “racial justice.”
Do you like Blaze News? Avoid censorship and sign up for our newsletter to get articles like this delivered straight to your inbox. Please register here!
