There is a saying when it comes to computers: “Garbage in, garbage out.” if It is bad inputit's going to get worse output. The same applies to political ideology and computers. Specifically, artificial intelligence (AI): Liberalism is in, liberalism is out.
These thoughts come to mind, new york times stock We know Apple is looking to improve its AI capabilities. The $3 trillion company, which excels in hardware manufacturing, is concerned that its voice assistant, Siri, is lagging behind other forms of AI. Notably, it's behind ChatGPT, which is controlled by Apple's biggest rival, Microsoft. The success of ChatGPT has given the Seattle software giant renewed momentum. Top of the standings.
Making AI faster requires more input, and Apple is asking liberals for that input.of times “The tech giant is offering multi-year deals worth at least $50 million to license its archives with news organizations including Condé Nast, publisher of Vogue and The New Yorker.” . NBC News. And IAC owns People, The Daily Beast, and Better Homes and Gardens. ”
Reveal your options. by all sides news rating portal, new yorker falls into the far left category because it has long “demonstrated bias through story selection and bias.” all sides Put The Daily Beast in the same left category. As for fashion magazines trendplenty of slip. liberal slant, too. especially, melania trumpunlike Hillary Clinton, Michelle Obama, and Jill Biden, for example, never appeared on the cover as a first lady. (and, teen vogueI'm left-handed Awakening is legendary. )
To be sure, not all AI companies are looking to license their material. Others just gathered information from where they found it. However, this harvest also reveals the following: new york times filed a lawsuit Filed a lawsuit against OpenAI for alleged copyright infringement. So it's a reminder that AI companies are focusing on the left side.
In fact, on January 8th response to times, OpenAI cited “partnerships” with mainstream media outlets, including the Associated Press, and, somewhat oddly, with the overtly left-wing New York University. The company added that it “looks forward to a constructive partnership with The New York Times.” This begs the question: Will we see a new back channel for big tech companies to subsidize MSM? If MSM distributors receive big checks from big tech companies, that is Is it conservation money for the species or a tacit acknowledgment that they are on the same side?
Big Tech censorship is about to get even worse. https://t.co/4k63deEAk5
— Breitbart News (@BreitbartNews) January 10, 2024
The idea that most media is left-leaning is not new. The same goes for conservative criticism. Back in 1969, the Republican vice president Spiro Agnewattacked the biases of the liberal media and set the tone for red-versus-blue divisiveness that resonates to this day. In fact, all new right-wing media implicitly criticize old left-wing media. That is enforcement of the First Amendment. On the other hand, Apple never hid his progressivismyou are equally free to use left-wing sources to guide your AI.
So, from one point of view, Apple's choice of a liberal media partner is nothing new. The birds on the left wing are flocking together. Conservatives and populists are sensitive to this trend and have developed their own counter-organisations.
But now AI is emerging as a game changer. New technology doesn't just change media; it transforms it. all. It transforms society and the economy. It will further impact everything we learn and know. For example, there is already a wealth of evidence that ChatGPT: lean to the left. That's not surprising. The company's head office is San Francisco.
In fact, the progressive direction of AI is so deep that it can confuse even those who have vowed to oppose it. Elon Musk has attacked “Awakened Mind Virus” We spent over a year writing our own AI, Grok, to compete against the likes of ChatGPT. However, just the other day, Grok declared“Of course trans women are women too.” Mr. Musk promised that Correct such excessesbut in the meantime we may wonder if there is anything. deep state Within the Empire of Masks.
Therefore, those who are not awake should be on guard. In fact, careful monitoring becomes even more important as we move away from “hard copy” records. That means desk drawers and file cabinets are being replaced by hard drives and digital files in the cloud. That's great from a convenience and searchability standpoint, but anything digital can change suddenly. For example, someone or something presses “delete” or changes it in a sneaky way.
Breitbart News covered the suppression of non-PC movies, including: Gone with the windrewritten to meet the faculty lounge standards of political correctness, similar to the “stealth editing” of classic works of literature. These stealth edits can be done remotely. A censor in Brooklyn can change the text on a mobile device in Beaumont or Billings.
It reminds me of a line from George Orwell. 1984:
Every record was destroyed or altered, every book rewritten, every picture repainted, every statue and street building renamed, every date changed. And the process continues day by day and minute by minute.
Such rewriting and reworking was relatively difficult for Orwell's “analog” imagination. In this digital age, it's just EZ point and click. And speaking of big brother government, thousands of “disinformation experts” on or near the federal payroll now have full access to databases and archives. Have you ever thought about what you would do in that case?
Moreover, the risk is not only active censorship, but also simple censorship. Carelessness and incompetence. In the 1975 movie roller ball, Set in a dystopia, great resetIn the future, a high-tech “librarian” works at a computer that stores all of the world's history. “It's embarrassing to misplace things,” admits the librarian. Did you leave something behind? “The whole 13th century.” The librarian sighed. “It's so distracting and annoying!” . . Too bad it's the 13th century. ” But then he consoled himself and said, “Not much happens in this century, just Dante and a few corrupt popes.”
So when we add AI, we see that knowledge itself becomes available. Information will be free in the sense that it will be widely available, but only from an AI perspective. To take a practical example, if a college student wanted to “write” a term paper on U.S. history, an AI would be happy to do it for him, but the product might look exactly like this: yeah. New York Times' 1619 project.
So what should I do? How do we stop woke governments and woke corporations from turning AI into a tool of propaganda and hegemony? One possible answer is to create an authority that mandates the 21st century, for example. “Fairness principle”.
Big Tech censorship must stop. pic.twitter.com/8OuBoaVY1n
— Breitbart News (@BreitbartNews) January 14, 2021
But the better answer is what has always worked for Americans. freedom. Freedom of speech and thought is of course important, but so is freedom of competition and innovation. That was the case 30 years ago. innovative Sees cable news and the Internet as right-wing alternatives to newspapers and broadcast television. Now we need similar competition and innovation when it comes to AI.
If Apple wants to be progressive, that's understandable. The Constitution also protects the left. But the right wing needs its own AI capabilities. Fight fire with fire. It all started with Grok the Mask. Please give more details. We're only safe if we have a significant technology base in Red America.
Achieving freedom requires a variety of efforts, from defending the nation to building the economy to forming families. We are also working to establish new bulwarks of freedom, including technological structures that protect the sanctity of information and freedom of speech. The next generation of AI-powered media bias is already here, and we need to fight the technological flames with our own countermeasures.
