Iran’s Targeting of Shipping Amid New Routes
Iran’s recent assaults on commercial shipping coincides with the United States and Oman starting to redirect ships along a new southern route, which hugs Oman’s coastline—essentially a way to keep this traffic out of Iran’s immediate control.
Some former U.S. military officials and regional experts suggest that this timing wasn’t accidental. They believe Iran aims to uphold one of its significant advantages as its influence over the Strait of Hormuz faces increasing challenges due to new shipping lanes and regional infrastructure developments.
“The southern route offers a pathway that they can’t charge for or dominate,” explained retired Navy Rear Adm. Mark Montgomery. “It’s clear they felt compelled to act.”
Disruptions and Strategic Shifts
For many years, Iran has wielded power over vessels navigating the Strait of Hormuz, stretching its influence far and wide. However, this grip is loosening as Gulf states invest in pipelines that bypass the strait and as the U.S. and Oman enhance the usage of this southern corridor. In fact, about half of all commercial traffic through the Strait now utilizes this new route, according to a maritime analytics company, Windward.
In response to Iran’s attacks on ships utilizing the corridor, the U.S. targeted Iranian military sites linked to these maritime operations. Iran quickly retaliated by targeting U.S. assets and regional allies, yet discussions were announced between the two countries to halt further assaults and return to talks in Doha.
Despite these announcements, Iran indicated it wouldn’t meet U.S. negotiators in Qatar on Tuesday.
Iran’s Strategy Behind Attacks
Vice Adm. Kevin Donegan, a former head of the Navy’s 5th Fleet, argues that Iran’s intention isn’t to completely halt shipping. “The Revolutionary Guards are attempting to render shipping commercially unviable,” he noted, stating these attacks are part of a broader strategy. Rather than shutting the strait down entirely, Iran may choose to keep insurance costs so elevated that shipping companies would be hesitant to operate there.
“They’re essentially trying to solidify control over the straits by pushing insurance rates up, while also testing America’s commitment,” he added.
Negotiations and Future of the Strait
The pressing issue now is whether Iran can turn its military pressure into lasting influence over the Strait. Under a recent memorandum agreed upon after a ceasefire, Iran, Oman, and Gulf states committed to allowing safe passage for commercial ships for 60 days, while they figure out future management and services for the strait.
President Trump claimed on social media that after this negotiation phase, there would be “no toll,” although the memorandum doesn’t specifically ensure that outcome. When confronted about this inconsistency, Trump assured that “common sense,” along with the threat of U.S. military action, would deter Iran from obstructing shipping.
Meanwhile, Iranian outlets have painted last-minute modifications to the agreement as a diplomatic win for Tehran, implying that management of the strait and provisions for interim tolls signify their leverage.
No official comments came from the White House as negotiations were set to begin. Gulf states seem adamant about preserving the status quo. Saudi Foreign Minister Prince Faisal bin Farhan remarked on the effectiveness of the strait’s control before the conflict. “What makes us think we should change things now because of the fighting?”
Regional Dynamics and Future Implications
This division illustrates the conflicting outlooks on Iran’s role in the Straits after hostilities cease. Former Assistant Secretary of State David Schenker emphasized that the negotiations symbolize Iran’s intention to emerge from the conflict with a “new status quo in the Persian Gulf.” However, controlling the strait is about more than just commercial shipping.
Clionad Rowley, the executive director of a conflict data project, suggested that Iran is stepping into a void left by Gulf governments questioning the reliability of U.S. partnership. This skepticism has realigned strategies in the region.
They’re rapidly trying to establish their own defense structures while exploring alternative trading routes. These initiatives had been in the works for years, yet recent conflicts have expedited them. For instance, Saudi Arabia is heavily investing in an east-west pipeline, linking its oil fields directly to the Red Sea, while the UAE enhances export routes from Fujairah, bypassing Hormuz entirely.
With every barrel not passing through the strait and every ship safely navigating the southern route, Iran’s historical leverage is gradually being diminished, even if the strait itself continues to stand as a critical energy passage.



