SELECT LANGUAGE BELOW

LA Times faces strong backlash online for criticizing those wanting to exit high-tax California

LA Times faces strong backlash online for criticizing those wanting to exit high-tax California

LA Times Columnist Faces Backlash Over California Tax Discussion

A columnist from the Los Angeles Times is drawing ridicule online after attempting to persuade Californians to stay in the state, particularly in light of a new tax proposal from Democrats aimed at high earners.

The Service Employees International Union (SEIU) is leading the push for this revised tax, claiming it is essential to fund additional social programs. However, some affluent Californians have expressed intentions to leave the state, potentially taking their tax contributions with them.

Commentator Lorraine Ali argues that wealthy residents owe their prosperity to California itself. She stated, “California made them some of the richest individuals globally, and now they’re considering leaving because the state demands some return.” Ali further suggests that these new taxes are vital to compensate for revenue losses resulting from tax cuts enacted during Donald Trump’s presidency.

Amid these discussions, it’s troubling that some of the country’s wealthiest individuals prefer to relocate rather than contribute a fraction of their wealth to their home state.

The article has faced significant criticism, with many commenters finding its stance to be disturbingly nationalistic. Richard Grenell, a U.S. envoy, stated, “California didn’t make them wealthy; their ingenuity and effort did. The state has, in a sense, held them back.” He noted that the columnist seems ill-informed regarding finance. Duke economist Michael Munger also expressed gratitude to the Times for providing a tangible example of what he views as absurdity in mainstream media discussions.

Comedian Kirk Wilcox echoed the sentiment, pointing out that California’s already progressive income tax system means the wealthy are already contributing significantly. He questioned the narrative suggesting they aren’t doing enough.

Reason’s Billy Binion remarked, “This is one of the most expected failures—wealth taxes simply don’t function. Wealthy individuals will just relocate to avoid them.” He asserted that the economy is enriched by these individuals, not the other way around.

Another critic asked, “If California can make anyone rich, why can’t it make everyone affluent and expect payment in exchange?”

The tax initiative is backed by service industry unions but is strongly opposed by Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom. He argues that the exodus of high-income individuals is harmful to the nation, emphasizing the tangible economic impacts, both directly and indirectly on startups.

“The evidence is clear. The fallout is substantial. I think this bill will be rejected, as people grasp the implications of such legislation,” he maintained.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Reddit
Telegram
WhatsApp

Related News