Democrats Stand Firm on Healthcare Demands Ahead of Government Funding Meeting
House minority leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) is making it clear that Democrats are not backing down on key demands as they approach a critical meeting concerning President Donald Trump and government funding.
If an agreement regarding 2026 funding priorities isn’t reached by the end of September 30th, there’s a real possibility of the federal government entering a partial shutdown late Wednesday night.
Nearly all House Democrats have dismissed the Republican proposal for a straightforward extension of the 2025 funding levels until November 21st.
Jeffries criticized this proposal, termed a partisan continuing resolution (CR), and he urged Republicans to consider concessions related to healthcare to gain Democratic support.
Speaker Johnson Issues a Warning on Possible Government Closure
During a last-minute press conference on Monday, Jeffries emphasized that Democrats would not agree to anything less than a formal plan to expand the Affordable Care Act (ACA) grants introduced during the Covid-19 pandemic.
“No one can trust their words about healthcare. Are you kidding me? These people have been trying to dismantle the Affordable Care Act since 2010,” Jeffries remarked. “Taking their claims of willingness to negotiate at face value is unfair to the American people.”
He also pointed out that a Democratic alternative CR aims to enhance these ACA grants, commonly recognized as “Obamacare.”
Understanding the Shutdown: Who Works and What It Costs
Senate minority leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA), and Senator John Thune (R-S.D.) are set to meet with Trump at 3 PM on Monday to discuss government funding.
Johnson and Thune, along with other Republican lawmakers, are encouraging Democrats to embrace bipartisanship. Johnson remarked that funding levels have essentially stayed the same since President Biden took office.
“We are ready to find a bipartisan solution to keep our government running while addressing the needs of Americans regarding lower living costs and healthcare,” he added. “However, we will not support a Republican spending bill that disrupts healthcare for the American people.”
Without congressional action, ACA grants from the pandemic era are projected to expire by the end of this year.
Thune indicated on NBC’s “Meet the Press” that he would entertain negotiations, but not in conjunction with ongoing government funding discussions.
“We can discuss this, but let’s first ensure the government remains operational,” he stated. “After that, we can address issues related to premium tax credits and necessary reforms to the program, which has its share of problems.”
The GOP-backed CR has mostly followed party lines and has already passed the House. It now awaits a Senate vote that will need several Democratic supporters to meet the 60-vote threshold.
Schumer is facing pressure from his party’s left wing, especially after having previously aided in moving along a Republican CR earlier this year, which is set to last until September 30th.
However, Jeffries reassured that he and Schumer are “in lockstep” about opposing the current Republican plan unless an acceptable compromise emerges.
Regarding their upcoming meeting with Trump, Jeffries noted, “We are heading into negotiations with a sincere intention to prevent a government shutdown while ensuring Republican attempts on American healthcare don’t continue.”
At another point, he emphasized, “Republicans control the House and Senate, along with the presidency. If there’s a government shutdown, it’s because Republicans chose that path.”
Meanwhile, Johnson criticized the Democratic approach during a recent appearance on “Sunday Morning Futures.” He claimed Republicans had already presented a simple, clean proposal to keep the government running for another seven weeks.
He continued, asserting, “What I want to do is avoid adding substantial spending to this bill. I find it troubling to consider funding health benefits for undocumented immigrants while also pushing back on rural healthcare aid. It’s just not feasible.”





