Sen. Mark Kelly Raises Concerns Over Political Violence

In a recent interview, Senator Mark Kelly (D-Ariz.) discussed the assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk, suggesting that President Donald Trump’s remarks regarding “incitement” against Democrats could provoke political violence. Kelly expressed his frustrations during an appearance on MS NOW’s Morning Joe.

“We will not follow illegal orders. This should be basic, yet it seems the president’s instinct is to politicize and even threaten violence against Congress members,” Kelly stated. He referenced Kirk’s assassination that occurred just two months ago, pointing out that Trump had previously talked about political violence and is now seemingly endorsing extreme measures.

Kirk was shot at Utah Valley University on September 10, prompting wide condemnation from various political quarters, many arguing that it reflected a troubling trend of increasing political violence.

Kelly’s remarks followed Trump’s criticisms of a video released by Democratic lawmakers, including Kelly, that encouraged military personnel to resist “illegal” orders. The video, shared by Senator Elissa Slotkin, has garnered significant attention online, with over 17 million views.

In response to the video, Trump labeled it “dangerous” and accused those involved of sedition, urging that they should be punished harshly. He even implied that their actions could warrant the death penalty.

Democrats, particularly Kelly, were quick to denounce Trump’s statements, interpreting them as a call for violence against the six lawmakers featured in the video. Kelly reiterated that military personnel should communicate any concerns about illegal orders through proper channels.

When asked about his advice to military members, Kelly emphasized the importance of dialogue with leadership. “They should explain why they believe an order is illegal. We have legal resources in the military, known as the Judge Advocate General,” he advised.

Trump, however, has dismissed the notion that he’s inciting violence, stating on Fox News Radio that his remarks were not threats but rather reflections of what he sees as serious legal violations by the lawmakers involved. He argued that such statements used to carry severe consequences.

In a follow-up interaction on social media, the White House Rapid Response Team criticized Kelly’s comments, accusing him of spreading misinformation and failing to cite specific instances of illegal orders. Their statement described him in harsh terms, emphasizing the contentious atmosphere surrounding this political issue.