Minneapolis Council Considers Lifting Bathhouse Ban
The Minneapolis City Council is looking at a significant shift in local regulations, as there’s growing support ahead of Wednesday’s vote on lifting a long-standing ban on bathhouses and similar establishments.
During a recent public hearing, council members listened to over 30 residents express their views on the proposal to repeal the ban. A number of LGBTQ activists voiced strong support for the change, highlighting how the existing ban disproportionately impacts those in same-sex relationships and individuals living with HIV and AIDS.
Researcher Jay Orn from the Aliveness Project emphasized the need for visibility and safety, stating, “Our job is not to eliminate the places where people have sex, but to bring them out of the shadows…” He noted that pushing these activities into less visible areas doesn’t mitigate risks but actually complicates outreach and education.
Another speaker, Patrick Scully, shared a personal reflection from his life under the previous ban in 1988, recalling, “I lived most of my life criminalized and excluded by the system.” He expressed frustration with societal expectations, pointing out the different paths LGBTQ individuals have had to navigate.
Activists have also drawn attention to the potential economic benefits of lifting the ban, suggesting it could boost the local tourism industry and foster healthier practices within the community.
Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey indicated that while he doesn’t view the ban as a priority, he would support the repeal if it passes the City Council.
The drive to repeal the ordinance is being led by LGBTQ+ advocates who are calling for change to a law originally passed in 1988, when it was supported by Brian Coyle, the first openly gay council member. Coyle’s legacy is acknowledged, although there are differing views on the historical context of the ban, particularly around the motives that led to its enactment.
Council member Jason Chavez defended the repeal by stating that respecting Coyle’s memory does not mean ignoring the prejudiced motivations behind the ban’s support. The City Council is expected to vote on the ordinance next week.
