The Resurgence of Conservative Christianity Among Gen Z
The New York Times opinion section is diving into the recent trend of conservative Christianity gaining traction among Gen Z in America and how this ties into the existing political divide.
In a recent guest essay, Daniel K. Williams noted that, despite around a third of Gen Z leaning towards secularism, there’s a notable revival of conservative Christianity. He attributes this shift to a quest for meaning in the wake of COVID-19 and a craving for community. Williams expresses concern that the blend of faith and right-leaning politics might amplify tribalism and lead to spiritual clashes. He even suggests that some conservative Christians could start doubting democracy if their beliefs aren’t reflected in voting outcomes.
Williams emphasizes that there’s a concerning trend where church attendance among young men has overtaken that of young women, a shift not seen before. By 2025, he cites data indicating that 65% of Gen Z men and 55% of Millennial men have attended church recently, a stark contrast to the 44% and 38% of their female counterparts from the same generations.
The piece warns that Gen Z Christians might face a daunting choice: either endure minority status in a democratic society or seek “victory” through less democratic measures in pursuit of family values. Williams positions this phenomenon as part of a broader pattern, where left-leaning media portray the resurgence of conservative Christianity as a precursor to increased division and potential authoritarianism.
To give Williams credit, he does recognize that Christianity’s appeal lies in its provision of purpose and belonging. However, he ultimately portrays this resurgence as a threat to “liberal democracy.” His warnings about potential democratic disintegration seem somewhat exaggerated. While he points to conservative Christians as a divisive force in the current political landscape, he largely neglects to consider that many on the left may contribute to this polarization as well. There’s a lack of exploration into how secular Gen Z individuals may also exhibit tribal tendencies through identity politics.
It’s worth noting that for centuries, civil religion in America has often served to unify rather than divide. Williams could have enriched his discussion by addressing the left’s role in shaping the rise of conservative views among these younger generations. Regardless, the fact that a prominent publication is raising alarms over youthful interest in traditionalism might be indicative of some hope for the future of younger Americans.
