total-news-1024x279-1__1_-removebg-preview.png

LANGUAGE

Red flag alert! Justice Department’s new center strikes at gun rights

The U.S. Department of Justice announced Monday a new law aimed at training state and local authorities how to apply red flag laws to confiscate firearms from gun owners deemed “a threat to themselves or others.” An entirely new organization has been announced.

These “red flag laws” are called “red flag laws.” extreme risk protection orderThis is a “civil court order temporarily restricting the use of firearms to individuals who engage in dangerous behavior or pose a high risk of harm to themselves or others.”

Public-private partnerships are a way to avoid bureaucracy you, Voters will be imposing what they want on the American people.

There are two important things to note here. First, these are “civil court orders” and not laws.Exists even without laws your To tell. This is not even a bill passed by Congress. The Ministry of Justice ignored the consent of the governed.

Second, these “civil court orders” deny due process. If you are deemed to pose a “high risk of harm” to yourself or others, authorities will confiscate your firearm without a court hearing. You will not have the opportunity to defend yourself in court in front of a jury of your peers. Bureaucrats will have the final say.

Learn how the Justice Department is trying to bypass Congress and pursue the constitutional right to bear arms. A completely new entity is National Emergency Risk Protection Order Resource Center. According to its website, its main purposes are:

The Department of Justice provides training and technical assistance to law enforcement officers, prosecutors, attorneys, judges, clinicians, victim and social service providers, community organizations, and others on the National Extreme Risk Protection Order (ERPO) ) We have launched a resource center (Center). Behavioral health professionals charged with enforcing laws to keep guns out of the hands of people who pose a threat to themselves or others.

Did you understand that? The center supports “those charged with enforcing laws to keep guns out of the hands of people who pose a threat to themselves or others.” Although they claim to be just “guidelines”, don’t be fooled. they are laws. Is that the law you voted for? Did your representatives vote for them? The establishment’s bureaucracy is free from the consent of the governed.

Ministry of Justice stated in a statement The laws for extreme risk protection orders are as follows:

Modeled after a domestic violence protection order. [and] Law enforcement, family members (in most states), medical professionals, and other parties (in some states) require that a person who is at risk of harm to themselves or others purchase and possess a firearm for a specified period of time. Create a civil procedure that allows a person to apply to a court for a temporary ban on such activities. of order.

Under the U.S. Constitution, I have the right to confront my accuser in court. If any party to this statement, whether law enforcement, family members, or medical professionals, accuses me of being unfit to own a firearm, I have the right to speak against them in front of a judge and jury. You have the right to defend yourself. Friends. It is a right to habeas corpus. These laws completely bypass habeas corpus and confiscate guns through “civil proceedings.”

Ministry of Justice Also mentions new resource center It will “provide training and technical assistance, including the development and dissemination of training for ERPO personnel.” Do you consider yourself one of the “stakeholders” in this new federal initiative? You were not consulted. It didn’t even represent me. The bureaucracy simply bypassed Congress and passed through the Justice Department.

This new bureaucratic initiative Johns Hopkins Gun Violence Solutions Center To provide “training and technical assistance.” It’s a “public-private partnership” – what a surprise! According to Johns Hopkins University, this assistance includes:

Development and dissemination of training for ERPO personnel. Support for state and local governments to implement ERPO programs. Facilitating peer-to-peer collaboration with model ERPO learning sites. Delivery of presentations and webinars to increase state and local government knowledge on key ERPO topics.

So the Justice Department will work with schools of “public health” to define what people should look for when it comes to high-risk gun owners. But since it’s a private institution, it’s not government overreach, right?Public-private partnerships are a way to avoid bureaucracy you, Voters will impose what they want on the American people.

Incidentally, Johns Hopkins is home to America’s first German Progressive Hospital. John Hopkins was the root of progressivism in the United States.

Twenty-one states and the District of Columbia have enacted extreme risk protection order laws, according to a Department of Justice press release. The White House noted that only six states that have enacted these laws have taken advantage of federal funding from the bipartisan Safer Communities Act. The law provides $750 million for “red flag” programs, medical health courts, drug courts, and veterans treatment courts.

Remember when the government asked veterans to receive more funding from the Department of Veterans Affairs just by saying they had PTSD? Unsurprisingly, many took advantage of that incentive. Did. The reason I was warning people not to do that is because it makes you “unstable” in the eyes of the government, and it becomes a marker for the government to take away your guns. And that’s exactly what they will do with this new bureaucratic Leviathan.

The Justice Department’s ridiculous National Extreme Risk Protection Order Resource Center is the latest in the government’s attempts to hide what the state is actually doing through “public-private partnerships,” “civil court orders,” and other bureaucratic means. This is an example. It has always aimed to take away your constitutional rights and impose its own agenda, regardless of your or Congress’ consent.

Want more information about Glenn Beck? Get Glenn’s free email newsletter Get his latest insights, top stories, show prep and more delivered to your inbox.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Reddit
Telegram
WhatsApp