What do you think of someone who sees a drag queen story hour as representing “freedom,” yet overlooks an American purchasing a Bible following Charlie Kirk’s death? I’m being quite intentional in my phrasing here.
David French strikes me as a deceitful critic of his fellow Americans. To me, he’s become a conduit for misinformation, and I’ll explain why I view it this way.
If there were any sense of poetic justice, you’d see “Judas” as the byline for David French. I can’t help but think he’s created a bleak future for himself.
Charlie Kirk’s legacy is undeniable. Many who interacted with the late Turning Point USA founder found their faith strengthened. Even Donald Trump Jr. discussed St. Stephen, the first martyr, when honoring Charlie. My bond with a man who dedicated his life to God had visible effects.
French, much like Kirk, possesses a significant platform. Writing for the New York Times gives him influence over a select audience. But truly, how does his faith draw anyone closer to Christ? The answer is none.
Instead, it seems that the French fail to honor what truly matters and make a mockery of values that are worth defending. The once-clear moral compass has turned into a caricature of itself – reminiscent of a more articulate Joe Biden without the fervor.
Individuals should not look to French for guidance as a serious Christian thinker. He needs to be called out as a purveyor of deceit. The apostle Paul mentioned his former associate Demas, who “loved the world,” illustrating how the French have swapped light for worldly approval and relevance.
It’s crucial for believers to guard against such betrayals. As faith becomes pricier and more defined today, the Bible has repeatedly cautioned about those who would infiltrate and poison the church. Paul himself named names and denounced falsehoods without hesitation, leaving no room for uncertainty about the threats.
The contemporary “gentler than God” crowd might criticize Paul for lacking compassion. Yet, Charlie Kirk recognized that clarity, not kindness, secures spiritual victories. His campus discussions never left students puzzled about what mattered. Admittedly, I didn’t always agree with his conclusions, but I was clear on the stakes involved. Living that conviction to the end is what faith demands.
Our faith focuses on the cross, compelling us to convey the gospel and its implications unambiguously.
Unfortunately, French’s actions send a contrary message. His public testimony bears no fruit. Instead, he seems to relish the approval of secular elites who actually disdain the Gospel. Despite warnings from the Bible about misleading others, he chose a path of deception and despair.
While I’ve largely disregarded French’s unraveling in recent years, now that Charlie is gone, I won’t let my friendship or the gospel be ridiculed by someone who seems to have turned against his own supporters. French couldn’t possibly measure up to Charlie Kirk, which might explain his bitterness. It feels like he’s trying to rewrite history to diminish Charlie’s sacrifice.
Indeed, he appears to be doing just that.
We shouldn’t take such greedy slander lightly. If there’s any justice, French’s byline can only be “Judas.” It’s a grim fate he’s paved for himself, and I dare say he will face the consequences.
