Laura: Traditional approaches to history have been jettisoned in favor of ‘restorative history’
Fox News host Laura Ingraham has criticized the Smithsonian Institution for allegedly endorsing a polarizing ‘activist agenda’ that portrays America in a negative light. She referred to the testimony from Anthea Hartig, the director of the National Museum of American History, regarding the museum’s educational content and some contentious displays, including one described as ‘fetish attire’ and a noted absence of pro-life narratives. Ingraham raises concerns over the use of taxpayer money for such initiatives.
On another note, the Trump administration claims that it has found evidence suggesting the Smithsonian has breached federal nondiscrimination laws. They are warning of potential funding withdrawal from its museums unless changes are made, as indicated in a recently released letter from the Department of the Interior.
The letter states that evidence suggests the institutional culture at the Smithsonian has led to violations of federal antidiscrimination laws—creating a hostile work environment and implementing practices that allocate opportunities based on race, ethnicity, and similar characteristics. However, specific examples of illegal conduct were not provided, and the Department of the Interior offered no further comments when asked.
Interestingly, a Fox News Digital investigation revealed that many key individuals at the Smithsonian, including those in hiring positions, advocate for diversity, equity, and inclusion — concepts that the Trump administration has previously labeled as discriminatory.
Conservative leaders, including Trump himself, have accused the institution of allowing progressive viewpoints to influence how American history is presented. An executive order issued in 2025 instructed officials to eliminate what it deemed ‘improper ideology’ from the museum.
According to a spokesperson from the DOI, the executive order mandates various officials to identify and use every available means to promote this new policy and restore confidence in the Smithsonian.
Amid criticisms, liberals argue that the backlash from conservatives represents an attempt to sway historical narratives for partisan gains.
The administration has stated that if corrective action is not taken by the Smithsonian regarding the issues raised in the DOI’s letter—and the broader biases alleged by conservatives—it may reconsider its financial support. These current threats appear more intense compared to previous disputes over the approximately $1 billion in federal funding that the Smithsonian receives annually.
The DOI letter notes that certain government departments may find it difficult to continue their support for the Smithsonian under its current leadership, which includes enabling artifact loans and supporting procurement processes.
While the letter lacks specific recommendations, it does emphasize that any appropriate response from the Smithsonian must address leadership and institutional ideology. This could have significant ramifications, especially since the institution operates independently but is overseen by a board whose members are appointed through congressional resolutions signed by the president.
As the Smithsonian approaches the filling of four board positions this October, the administration might use this opportunity to assert more influence over the institution.
A representative from the White House’s Domestic Policy Council, Vince Haley, articulated that many Americans do not want the Smithsonian National Museum of American History utilized as a ‘prime tool of social justice’ or as a platform for ideological activism. He expressed hope that the Smithsonian would honor its commitment to narrate a truthful and inspiring account of American history, spotlighting the contributions of the Founding Fathers.
Additionally, the DOI has requested that Smithsonian representatives meet with administration officials promptly to address concerns regarding bias and civil rights violations at the institution.
During a congressional hearing in July, Anthea Hartig stated, “The museum does not take sides in America’s political debates. We document the evidence of American life in all of its diversity so that the public can engage with the past and form their own opinions.”
When contacted by Fox News Digital for comments about the letter, the Smithsonian chose not to respond.
Recent reports indicate that many museum leaders and curators have connections to liberal advocacy or Democratic politics. In addition to the contentious exhibits at the National Museum of American History, even the National Zoo, which is operated by the Smithsonian, is filled with information relating to DEI and gender equity.
