The Trump administration recently supported plans to cut Iran’s nuclear ambitions, initially adopting an Obama-era view on enrichment and suddenly adopted a zero-tolerance approach.
Up to this point, US Special Envoy Steve Witkoff appears to be inconsistent statement Regarding progress in negotiations with the Islamic Republic, Backtracking The first statement on April 15 supported that Iran was able to be surveillance and enrich uranium for civilian purposes. Experts say the sudden change in the message suggests a major behind-the-scenes conflict between hardlines who want to completely dismantle Iran’s nuclear program and restraint-minded officials who prefer diplomatic options with limited surveillance enrichment.
“It’s the neoconservatives of the administration, people like Marco Rubio and people near the president like Lindsey Graham and Tom Cotton are trying to guide the blind alley, a war with Iran at the end.” “If we say our goal is to get zero enrichment in Iran, then you’re going to get Iran to acquire nuclear weapons, go to war with Iran, or both.”
Witkoff initially hopes that the US will pursue a complete dismantling of Iran’s nuclear program on April 14, and instead supports maintaining Iran’s uranium enrichment within a 3.67% civil application standard. But Witkoff I walked Returning to some of his comments a day later, he emphasized that Iran does not have uranium enrichment. The State Department did not respond to DCNF’s request for comment.
“The contract with Iran will only be completed if it is a Trump deal. The final arrangement must establish a framework for peace, stability and prosperity in the Middle East. That is, Iran must halt and eliminate its nuclear enrichment and weaponization programme.
– Envoy’s Envoy’s Office to the Middle East (@se_middleeast) April 15, 2025
The mixed signal from Witkov for just two days shows that it points to a wider conflict within the Trump administration. (Related: “Exit Ramp”: Trump’s negotiations with Iran will determine the future of the administration as there are walls nearby.)
Sources within the government I said The New York Times was told by the New York Times after his administration’s numbers in support of diplomacy, including Vice President J.D. Vance Vance, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegses and Director of the National Intelligence Bureau, which led to his military surprise in Iran last month.
This handout, provided by the office of Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, marks the 46th anniversary of the Islamic Revolution in 1979, shows praying in the tomb of the late Tehran Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ruhola Khomeini on January 30, 2025. (via Photo by – /Khamenei.ir/AFP Getty Images)
The Joint Comprehensive Action Plan (JCPOA), established under the administration of former President Barack Obama, has long been criticized by conservatives, including Trump, for being too soft in Iran, including sunset clauses and sundown clauses that allowed Iran’s nuclear pursuits to flourish and inactive surveillance.
Witkov initially said that all sorts of sunset clauses for sanctions are off the table in nuclear deals, and that surveillance carried out by the International Atomic Energy Agency will be strengthened. According to On the Jerusalem Post.
Some experts said Witkoff’s initial proposal had significant similarities to the conditions of the JCPOA.
“This is a repackaged Obama JCPOA,” says Mark Debowitz, CEO of the Democracy Foundation (FDD). I said Jerusalem post on Witkov’s first comment on April 15th.
Under former President Joe Biden, Iran has regained much of its economic strength from the oil reserves that he bleed during Trump’s first term. Raising Iran’s oil revenues were $37 billion in 2021, $54 billion in 2022, and $53 billion in 2023.
Furthermore, Biden never signed a contract in 2022 to curb Iran’s uranium enrichment, declaring the JCPOA “dead.”
Some more restraint-oriented conservatives are skeptical of JCPOA comparisons.
More Iranian Hawkish often propose “Libyan models” Dismantling Iran’s nuclear program. Under Gaddafi, Libya voluntarily abandoned the entire nuclear program in 2003 in exchange for US sanctions.
Trita Parsi, executive vice president of the Quincy Institute for Responsible and Responsible Statistics and an expert on US-Iran relations, told the DCNF that comparison with the Obama deal is a useful tactic among interventionists who discourage Trump from pursuing diplomatic solutions.
“I think there is despair among those who wanted him to go down the path of Israeli favor in order to try and shame him not to pursue a validation model,” Parsi told DCNF. “They are easy to try and make these arguments that claim this is too similar to Obama’s deal, and try to keep Trump away from it, not through the appeal of their own argument.”
“I think this was just a feature of the administration on this issue that may reflect that there are sometimes inaccurate or inconsistent messaging and that some of these issues have not been fully resolved within the industry,” Parsi told DCNF.
All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation is an independent, nonpartisan newswire service that is free to use for legitimate news publishers that can provide large audiences. All republished articles must include logos, reporter signatures and DCNF affiliation. For questions regarding our guidelines or partnerships with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.
