Confirmation Hearing for Stephen Milan
Stephen Milan, President Trump’s nominee for the Federal Reserve, sought to reassure Republican lawmakers during his confirmation hearing on Thursday. He faced criticism from Democrat senators but remained steady in his responses.
Milan, currently chairing the Economic Advisors Council, explained his choice to take an unpaid leave instead of resigning if confirmed as a Fed governor. He mentioned that his legal counsel recommended this approach, which he described as a four-month appointment ending in January.
“I intend to maintain that independence and to put my capabilities to the American people to the fullest,” Milan stated, emphasizing his dedication to the Federal Open Market Committee’s independent decision-making.
Republican members of the committee seemed supportive of him and expressed satisfaction with his answers during the hearing. For instance, Sen. Bernie Moreno (R-Ohio) remarked on the importance of restoring the Fed’s independence, expressing his approval of Milan’s views on topics like diversity, equity, inclusion, climate, and pandemic spending. Milan asserted that he does not believe these matters should fall under the central bank’s jurisdiction.
On the other hand, Democrats, including Senator Jack Reed from Rhode Island, were critical, with some using harsh language to describe Milan and his potential role. It seemed they shifted the focus away from evaluating his qualifications to voicing general discontent with the Trump administration.
“Your independence is already seriously compromised,” Reed commented, while New Jersey Sen. Andy Kim suggested that Milan would be under the watchful eye of the president during his tenure.
In response to the criticisms, Milan maintained that he hadn’t been asked to endorse low interest rates. His policies would rely solely on economic data and independent analysis, reinforcing Republican confidence in his qualifications.
Milan brings a wealth of economic policy experience to the position, having held senior roles and produced significant analyses of monetary policy. His 2024 paper on the Fed’s accountability also demonstrates his deep engagement with central banking issues.
According to federal law, board members are required to “dedicate all time to the board’s business.” Milan indicated that his temporary leave arrangement is common for short-term appointments. Notably, several Fed officials have taken temporary leaves from their jobs, just as he would. For example, current Fed governor Adrinna Kugler had a similar arrangement during her term.
The hearing took place amidst ongoing tensions between the administration and Federal Reserve leaders. President Trump is pursuing legal action related to an allegation against Fed Gov. Lisa Cook.
Milan was nominated to fill the vacancy left by Coogler’s unexpected resignation in August. If confirmed, he will play a key role in crucial Fed policy decisions, especially as the authorities contemplate resuming interest rate cuts. However, Kugler’s term will conclude at the end of January next year.
The Fed currently faces complex monetary policy decisions following a pause in interest rate cuts since January. Current rates are sitting between 4.25% and 4.5%, and there are signs of a softening labor market amid persistent inflationary pressures.
The Democrat opposition seemed driven more by broader resistance to Trump appointees rather than specific concerns regarding Milan’s qualifications. Their confrontational stance stood in contrast to the Republicans, who focused on his economic acumen and policy background.
The Federal Reserve operates under Congressional mandates aimed at achieving price stability and maximum employment, with decisions made by a 12-member committee that includes seven governors and five rotating regional bank presidents. Governors serve 14-year terms, which helps insulate them from political pressures.
Overall, Republicans on the committee appeared convinced that Milan’s extensive background and strong commitment to independence make him a suitable candidate during this challenging economic period.

