On January 20, a company in which President Trump suppressed his opinion through his predecessor through his predecessor, was adjacent to a major technical executive that suppressed his supporters on January 20. Ta.
A few hours later, the president took action behind his words, Signed the presidential decree The Federal Government is prohibited from providing, promoting, or funding, “acts to reduce the freedom of American citizens with unconstitutional”.
“Americans are free people and we do not violate lightly and lightly. It's time to regain the rights given by God for resistance and free expression.”
This movement was celebrated by people who were considered to be a blow to the censorship. Others throw a presidential decree as a dangerous license to “wrong information” and “false information”.
Obviously, this is the latest salvation in the progress of the Digital Public Square, and the Republican Allies, which are the same as the Trump administration, are not only domestic enemies but also global reflection ecosystems. It is to fight.
The global voice polishing initiative looks like an early target. It seems that Trump himself has reported it when he advertised the Davos's World Economic Forum by remotely order on January 23. There was an elite global conclave recently Declared “Incorrect information and fake information” during the second year of the earth, the main short -term risk of the earth was “the sustainable threats to social unity and governance worsening the trust and the division between the nations. We emphasize their sustainable threats.
Two days after taking office, Mr. Marco Rubio, Secretary of State of Trump, said, “”Second Trump administration's priority and mission of the Ministry of State。 The short document included the accusation that the fog's bottom must stop censorship and suppression of information. Rubio will continue:
The Ministry of State's efforts to fight malicious propaganda has been fundamentally changed since the Cold War. The Ministry of State, which I lead, supports and defends American rights for free statements, and ends the program that leads to some form of American censorship.
It is unknown whether the Rubio approach will affect the successor after the recent closed global engagement center of the Ministry of State. The critic has rejected the non -trained. This was simply rejected an office that provides funds to the domestic speech targeting entrepreneurs as simply changing and sustaining an office.
The State Department did not respond to the RealClearinVestigation inquiry related to this story.
A vast and funded network
The global “Counter Dees Information” ecosystem covers top academic institutions' research centers, think tanks, factors, news representatives, and for -profit organizations that make aspirations the same. It affects both the state and the government throughout the Atlantic Ocean.
RealClearinVestigations, it Recently previewed The battle of censorship sent an email to other US institutions and departments, which seem to be involved in voice suppression in social media.
These included the Ministry of Justice and the FBI. The Ministry of Land Security and its cyber security and infrastructure security sub -agencies. Defense and Ministry of Health and Welfare. National Science Foundation; and offices of management and budget.
“The Pentagon will fully execute and implement all the orders of the presidential order issued by the President, and will cooperate with the maximum professionalism, efficiency, and national security goals.” A Pentagon official told the RCI. I have a department before Please light It is considered to be a conservative and independent outlet, which provides funds to the news evaluation entity, which is seen by critics.
“We are carefully examining all administrative orders and implementing them in accordance with the RCI,” said the National Science Foundation spokesman. December 2024 ReportThe House of Representatives has argued that the Foundation has “poured the development of AI -drive tools to monitor and censors a large amount of online content,” the Foundation of the Foundation.
Some departments did not respond to RCI inquiries. Others introduced the question to the White House. I didn't respond.
Despite the new administration trying to end the censorship efforts of the government and the government, the controversy of Trump's presidential orders may be an instruction to identify people who have ched a speech in the past. You can do it.
The order is to investigate the Corporate Secretary and other executive departments and agencies to investigate the federal government's activities that violate the order conducted in the Biden era, and the administration is “online platforms. Censors your speech has trampled the freedom of speech, “said President Trump's report,” with the appropriate recommendation for corrections. ” It is not clear whether such corrections will include prosecutions.
Is it dangerous ahead?
The founder and CEO of the Columbia University Law, Philip Hamburger, the founder and CEO of the New River Alliance, represented several plaintiffs in the Supreme Court lawsuit. Mercy V. Missouri -We told RCI that Trump's actions were not sufficiently progressing in a case where the federal conspiracy with social media companies was exposed and the disadvantaged speech was suppressed.
“Large -scale instructions are very welcomed, but if you abandon the qualified exemptions of CISA, FBI, and other related organizations for free speech violations, it was even more valuable. Sho.”
Alex Abd, a litigation director of the Colombian University Night First Correction Research Institute, provided opposition. Abdo wrote Just security Since the order predicts that the previous administration is engaged in illegal acts, investigating the Biden administration will be malicious.
“Even worse, the report may work very well as an outlet of the Trump administration's own censorship,” Abdo wrote. “For example, if the report further targets researchers engaged in research on first amendment protection, the administration will accurately accuse the Biden administration.”
The House of Representatives Judicial Committee is ready to make a complementary effort in this session. The Panel told the RCI, “In addition to the continuation of the FBI and the FBI, and the threats of foreign censorship to American speeches.”
The role of the law
I have Trump before Requested “We will establish a new law to end the constitution in partnership with private organizations and lay out a clear criminal penalty for the federal bureaucrats that steals the right of the first, fourth, and fifth revision.”
To that end, the spokesman of the Judicial Committee is to the RCI, and the panel is “quick to re -introduce the law to protect the first revision of Americans, such as the responsibility law of censorship and the lack of censorship on our coast. Move. ” former We provide the Federal Employee the right to act for the violation of Article 1. the latter Foreign officials engaged in censorship in American speeches are unacceptable and can be deported.
Two days after the release of President Trump's order, Kentucky Republican Land Paul re -introduced “”.Speech free protection law。 ”
In line with the administrative order, the law prohibits the federal government employee to censors to censorship of a platform protected speech, and provides grants related to programming related to the wrong information or fake information. The purpose is to prohibit it. It also imposes penalties for law violations, such as disciplinary action, more than $ 10,000 civil punishment, inappropriate retirement benefits, and permanent cancellation of the relevant security clearance. The bill also allows people who believe that their rights are violated to file a civil lawsuit against suspected violations.
“Americans are free people, and we do not infringe freedom. Senator Paul wrote by re -introducing the bill.
Editor Note: This article was originally published by RealClearinVestigations and became available through Realclearwire.
