USMS seeks public relations assistance regarding the transgender athlete controversy; female swimmers decline

Controversy in Masters Swimming Over Transgender Participation

Three female athletes from the US Masters Swimming (USMS) organization have raised concerns regarding the group’s decision to seek public relations assistance amidst a controversy surrounding transgender athletes competing in women’s events. This comes after Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton initiated a lawsuit against USMS.

The lawsuit originates from events that took place in San Antonio at the end of April, where a transgender athlete claimed victories in five women’s events. In response, USMS sent an email to its members on Tuesday, requesting help in preserving the organization’s image.

As part of their newly launched #swimsuitsnotlawsuits campaign, the organization emphasized the need for accurate information. The email requested members to counter misinformation they might encounter and to share positive aspects about USMS within their communities.

It also mentioned “rumors” regarding the situation, suggesting that the initial concerns arose during a national competition. An external entity allegedly fueled speculation about the swimmer’s eligibility.

In June, USMS updated its gender eligibility policy to restrict the participation of biologically male athletes in female events, although they are still allowed to compete.

Wendy Enderle, a long-time female swimmer who has competed alongside transgender athletes, described the email’s tone as dismissive of women’s concerns. She noted that the organization seems to overlook the requests for eligibility reviews submitted months prior, and this PR effort feels disconnected from the realities faced by many female competitors.

Explaining her feelings, Enderle said that the dedication and hard work she and others invest feel unrecognized, which is frustrating. She had previously asked for a review regarding a transgender athlete’s eligibility but claimed she received no feedback.

Another swimmer, Angie Griffin, called attention to the policy that allows men to participate without meeting specific eligibility requirements. Griffin expressed concern that USMS is prioritizing its public relations over addressing the issues raised by affected female athletes. She stated, “We don’t ask for much—just a response. Those who filed complaints deserve acknowledgment.” A simple reply could help rebuild the trust that seems lost.

Cochran, yet another female swimmer, mentioned that she won’t compete in any USMS events after receiving the organization’s email. She criticized the attempt to clarify misconceptions without addressing the formal complaints made by women. She feels that the organization isn’t seriously engaging with the concerns of its members and welcomed the intervention of state attorneys general in the ongoing struggle for fairness in women’s sports.

A spokesperson for USMS clarified that the eligibility review process for the athlete mentioned is still “ongoing,” and they are keen to navigate this issue with fairness. The spokesperson also differentiated the recent email communications from the eligibility review process, arguing that their intent is to address misunderstandings about USMS rather than sidestepping the issues raised by female swimmers.