A debated road tax is set to appear on the ballot later this year, despite Fresno County’s ongoing lawsuit against California for mandating it to go before voters, as stipulated in a bill recently signed by Governor Gavin Newsom.
Last week, Newsom endorsed Assembly Bill 1923, compelling Fresno County to include the Better Roads, Safer Streets initiative on the November ballot. Should it pass, the initiative would introduce a half-cent sales tax aimed at enhancing roads and transportation.
Initially, Fresno County supervisors had called for a 30-day review of the citizen-initiated measure, but critics argued that the intent behind this was to push the timeline beyond November. Consequently, proponents of the tax urged lawmakers to ensure it made it onto the ballot.
This last-minute change left county supervisors frustrated. Fresno County Commission Chairman Gary Bredefeld expressed his concerns over the state overstepping its boundaries.
“This isn’t just about funding; it’s about who gets to govern Fresno County. Can we decide for ourselves, or will we be overruled every time by political influences from Sacramento?” Bredefeld stated.
The county’s lawsuit against the state articulates that AB 1923 represents “a unique statute in the modern history of California election law.”
Supervisor Nathan Magsig shared with a local news outlet that county officials—after consulting with legal experts—believe the bill signed by Newsom is “flawed” and “vague,” posing “serious constitutional issues,” according to a statement.
The lawsuit mentions James Kass, Fresno County’s election clerk, who has indicated he will adhere to state law, despite county supervisors wishing to delay elections until March 2028. Kass did note, however, that ongoing legal proceedings could alter that situation.
“Moving forward, courts may interpret the Congressional bill more narrowly,” he remarked.
Meanwhile, supporters of the tax have criticized the county’s legal actions.
“Democracy shouldn’t be overturned just because a few individuals want things their way,” Sandra Celedon, a member of the initiative, commented. “You might think the sky is purple, but reality remains, and a vote is still on the horizon for November.”
A ruling from the court is expected by September 9, which is also the deadline for printing and shipping ballots.
