President Putin has made clear that “If Ukraine fires long-range missiles at Russia, Ukraine, like other NATO countries, will consider the missile supplier an enemy in the war against Ukraine.''
“If this decision is taken, it will mean direct participation of NATO countries, the United States and European countries in the war against Ukraine,” he said in September.
And now America finds itself on the brink of what many are calling the next world war. In a major policy shift over the weekend, President Biden authorized Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy to launch ATACMS missiles deep into Russian territory.
The Ukrainian government has been pushing Washington to approve ATACMS for some time, but Biden remains reluctant to greenlight the initiative to avoid further U.S. involvement in the war.
But now that things have changed, there are two burning questions we all have. What would it be like for Russia to consider the United States a war enemy? And why would President Biden do something like this?
glenn beck and his lead author and researcher Jason Butrill explore the possibilities.
– YouTubewww.youtube.com
World War III?
“Biden brought us to the brink of World War III,” Glenn says.
“The threat is clearly much higher,” agrees Jason, a former Pentagon intelligence analyst.
However, “Putin's response will probably be to remove the missiles as quickly as possible.'' Even though “the threat of nuclear weapons exists,'' it is possible that “Putin does not intend to nuke cities.'' expensive.
“The biggest threat will be tactical nuclear weapons,” Jason predicts. It is a “low-yield weapon made exclusively for the battlefield.''
“Let's say some ATACMS is surrounded by several battalions of the Ukrainian army. Well, the only way to ensure its destruction is to use tactical low-yield nuclear weapons that destroy the entire battlespace, including the ATACMS. “That's the more likely scenario,” he explained, adding that it was “the more likely scenario.”
While this may not be the nuclear war everyone fears, “if it were to happen, it would still be a major international failure.” [Russia] If you did something like that, it would definitely “escalate.”
There is no doubt that this would put the United States in a precarious position.
“Are we going to allow them to push a button and fire a missile, or are we going to send in actual U.S. assets to take over areas inside Russia and not even have time to push a button?” Jason asks.
If the latter happens, “then it escalates to a whole different level.”
Why now?
“Why are you doing this?'' Glenn asks.
Jason's theory is “system survival.”
“When it comes to the Pentagon-security-military complex, I think they are afraid of the Trump administration changing the status quo,” he says. “I think they want to push us to a point of no return, a point where we can’t do what President Trump tried to do.”
“I think they are pushing us to a point of no return, where Trump and his Cabinet have no choice but to continue,” he added. “That's the only reason it makes sense two months before they take power.”
Conversations including whether Russia wants further US involvement in the war, what's going on with the Baltic Sea undersea communications cable that was abruptly severed on Monday, and British Airways losing contact with its planes. To hear more about the massive IT failure, watch the clip above.
Want more information about Glenn Beck?
To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis, and uncanny ability to make sense of chaos, visit Sign up for BlazeTV — The largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, protect the Constitution and live the American Dream.
