Victims of a convicted serial child predator expressed their anger this week after the California Parole Board decided to approve the potential release of David Allen Funston. They argue that he has not shown true remorse and fear he might harm others if freed. One victim, Amelia, voiced her disgust, saying, “I can’t believe people can change like that.”
This reaction followed the board’s determination that Funston, now 64, was eligible for parole. He had been convicted in 1999 on 16 felony counts connected to a series of kidnappings and child sexual abuses, resulting in a sentence of over 20 years, along with three consecutive life terms.
Funston qualified for the California Elderly Parole Program, which permits inmates over 50 who have served 20 years to be considered for early release.
The parole board’s decision drew immediate criticism from victims, law enforcement officials, and state authorities. California Governor Gavin Newsom had previously requested the board to reassess their choice after they approved Funston’s release. He conveyed his disapproval through a spokesperson, emphasizing that he did not agree with the outcome.
Newsom, however, lacks the authority to overturn the board’s decisions outright. Funston’s attorney, Maya Emig, pointed out that the board has previously reaffirmed the decision and stated there is no precedent for a reconsideration.
Amelia revealed that Funston’s abuse has had lasting repercussions on her life, creating ongoing trauma and difficulties in wanting to start a family. She expressed her concerns regarding Funston possibly returning to Sacramento and what that could mean for his relatives and the community. “Who knows if he’ll do something like this again?” she questioned, voicing disbelief over allowing his release.
Amelia also rejected Funston’s claims of feeling “disgusted and ashamed” of his past, stating firmly, “No, I don’t and I have no intention of doing so.” She acknowledged the importance of forgiveness as outlined in religious teachings, but also noted that certain actions are difficult, if not impossible, to forgive.
Former Sacramento County District Attorney Anne Marie Schubert condemned the decision as “shocking” and suggested that the expansion of the elderly parole program, supported by Newsom, is troubling. She criticized the law that enables the release of serial sex offenders without restrictions, noting the reduction of the service requirement and expanded eligibility age.
Schubert emphasized the severity of Funston’s crimes and called for reform, pledging to exert every effort to contest this decision. She mentioned submitting a new letter to the parole board, asserting that they possess the legal capability to rescind the release.
“We regarded him as a sexually violent offender,” she added, reiterating their request for civil charges. “At the very least, we are going to strive to change this law.”
