In a truly free society, there are ten essential components that need to exist. These include the “rule of law,” “free and fair elections,” individual rights protection, separation of powers, judicial independence, press freedom, civilian military control, minority rights protection, economic freedom, and a culture of freedom.
Based on these criteria, it has been argued that Canada represents a stark contrast to the ideals of freedom.
To bolster this claim, there are 20 recent instances cited that suggest Canada has diverged from these foundational principles.
1. Laboratory scandal cover-up
Back in 2021, it came to light in the Canadian Parliament that a leading scientist at the Institute for Security Studies had sent live Ebola samples to the Wuhan Institute of Virology while collaborating with the Chinese military on bioweapons. Despite four requests from Parliament for documents, the Liberal Party continually obstructed access, launching lawsuits, delaying investigations, and even calling a snap election to stifle the inquiry.
“This undermines both the rule of law and the separation of powers,” a critic noted.
2. Anti-corruption efforts
Just three years later, the Auditor General uncovered around $400 million in apparent corruption, after which the Liberal Parliament abruptly ceased further investigation and debate.
“It’s a breach of accountability and independent oversight,” the critic commented.
3. Administrative legal rule
Following Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s resignation in 2025, Mark Carney was installed as Prime Minister by a small elite group representing just 0.33% of the Canadian population. During this time, Parliament was inactive for eight months, with the country managed entirely through presidential decree without any debate or voting.
“Without oversight or debate, what does representation even mean? This is not democracy,” was expressed.
4. Election interference overlooked
The Canadian Security Intelligence Service confirmed that China had interfered in both the 2019 and 2021 elections by financially backing 11 candidates, yet Prime Minister Trudeau was informed and did nothing.
“This effectively dismantles the concept of a fair election,” the critic asserted.
5. Justice inequality
A Liberal MP encouraged citizens to claim bounties set by the Chinese Communist Party against Conservative candidates, and no legal repercussions followed.
This sparked concerns over equal application of the law.
6. Manipulated democracy
During subsequent votes, irregularities occurred, such as 121 postal ballots left uncounted and erroneous data skewing results. Remarkably, five MPs switching to the Liberal Party extended their majority by two seats.
“Was this democracy by design or mere manipulation?” the question lingered.
7. Stifling of peaceful protests
In response to the 2022 Freedom Convoy protests, the government invoked emergency laws that froze the bank accounts of protestors and supporters. This action faced unanimous rulings from two federal courts as being unreasonable and a violation of charter rights, yet the government continues its appeal.
It was described as “suppressing freedom of speech and assembly.”
8. News control
Bill C-18, also known as the Online News Act, mandated that Google and Meta pay fees for linking to Canadian Press content. Consequently, Meta blocked news access for Canadian users on its platforms, which allowed the government to manage information access.
“This compromises press freedom,” the critics conveyed.
9. Cultural and speech regulation
With Bill C-11, platforms like Netflix and YouTube came under federal regulations that imposed content quotas, enabling state influence over cultural expression.
“It infringes on free speech and cultural representation,” was the firm assertion.
10. Disregarding public opinion
The government maintained the carbon tax despite considerable public dissent, also replacing visible sales taxes with hidden regulations that inflated fuel prices. It aimed to mandate electric vehicle sales by 2035 before shifting to indirect emissions regulations.
“Where’s the transparency?” was a common lament.
11. Property seizure
Ontario’s Bill 212 permits rapid government approval for highway projects, allowing the quick removal of property owners from their land.
It raises fears around property rights.
12. Covert land acquisition
Authorities in Waterloo used NDAs and expropriation threats to acquire 770 acres of prime agricultural land for an undisclosed megasite, with local farmers only informed post-factum.
This affair also raised property rights concerns.
13. Judicial favoritism
In New Brunswick, a judge reduced a convict’s sentence to prevent deportation, prioritizing skill over lawful enforcement.
This incident was seen as a blatant violation of justice principles.
14. Government competition
The Toronto City Council endorsed a government-operated grocery store that would avoid standard taxation, negatively impacting private businesses.
“This undermines fair market practices,” was the sentiment.
15. Tax burden on locals
Forced municipal amalgamations in rural New Brunswick led to a sudden tax increase of 50% to 60% for homeowners.
16. Permit demand economy
In British Columbia, a permit-based economy is emerging, requiring citizens to seek government permissions for everyday tasks or incur hefty fines.
“This erodes financial freedom,” the response suggested.
17. Firearm confiscation
The government has banned around 2,500 previously legal firearms, branding the buyback program as “voluntary,” while warning non-compliance could lead to jail time.
“Is this a matter of property rights?” was raised.
18. Medical assistance in dying
Introduced in 2016, with safeguards lifted in 2021, more than 76,000 Canadians have utilized this program, making it the fourth leading cause of death in the nation.
“If the state offers death as a solution, citizens become mere cost centers,” was the grim warning.
19. Criminalizing dissent
The proposed ‘Fighting Hate’ Bill (C-9) could introduce new penalties for “hate,” potentially impacting religious beliefs, peaceful protests, and political opposition.
“There’s no space for freedom of speech here,” was highlighted.
20. Exit tax proposal
A suggestion was made for a $500,000 “exit tax” on educated Canadians wanting to leave the country, reminiscent of the Berlin Wall.
“Is this not a barrier to immigration rights?” was questioned.
Overall, the claim is that Canada has drifted away from being a free nation or a democracy and is now described as a “controlled oligarchy with democratic facades.” Furthermore, there is a concern that if the United States does not tread carefully, it could find itself in a similar predicament.
“Recognize the signs, America. This might be your future,” was a notable warning.
“If we allow foreign influence, permit governments to curtail protests, or enforce regulations that compromise our freedoms, we could wake up to find ourselves in the same troubled state.”
For more information about Glenn Beck
To gain further insights from Glenn’s analysis, visit for more concerning the ongoing issues.
