SELECT LANGUAGE BELOW

Donald Trump Calls on Alabama Legislature to Find Way to Preserve IVF

Former President Donald Trump is asking the Alabama Legislature to find a way to preserve in vitro fertilization (IVF) in Alabama following last week’s Alabama Supreme Court ruling that frozen embryos are considered fetuses. , argued that “Republicans should always work together.” The miracle side of life. ”

“Under my leadership, the Republican Party will always support building strong, prosperous, and healthy American families. We will not make it harder for mothers and fathers to have babies; We want to make it easier,” Trump said in a post on Truth Social on Friday.

“This includes supporting access to infertility treatments, including in vitro fertilization, in every state in the United States,” he continued.

“Like the overwhelming majority of Americans, including the majority of Republicans, conservatives, Christians, and pro-life Americans, I strongly support the availability of IVF to couples trying to have a precious baby,” Trump said. It urges the Alabama Legislature to “act quickly to find an immediate solution to maintain the availability of IVF in Alabama.”

“Republicans should always stand on the side of the miracle of life, and on the side of mothers, fathers, and beautiful babies. I will always be with you in your quest,” Trump added.

Trump’s plea follows Friday’s ruling by the Alabama Supreme Court that frozen embryos are considered fetuses under state law, and anyone who destroys them can be held liable. .

As Breitbart News’ Katherine Hamilton details,

The case centers on whether the reproductive health center can be held liable under the Wrongful Death of Minors Act after patients accessed, dropped, and destroyed several couples’ frozen embryos in 2020. There is. Embryos were created for the required process. In in vitro fertilization (IVF), “mature eggs are taken from the ovaries, fertilized by sperm in a laboratory, and [and] A procedure then takes place in which one or more fertilized eggs, called embryos, are placed in the uterus, where the baby will grow. ” according to Go to Mayo Clinic.

The state’s high court ultimately reversed a lower court’s decision not to recognize frozen embryos as fetuses. The Alabama Supreme Court has ruled that it is “public policy” to recognize “the sanctity of unborn life and the rights of unborn children,” based on the Sanctity of Unborn Life Amendment adopted into the state constitution in 2018. he declared.

“The central issue raised in these consolidated appeals concerns the death of embryos kept in cryogenic nurseries, and the law does not include extrauterine children, i.e. children born outside the biological womb. “The question is whether there is an implied exception to that rule for the fetus located at the moment it is killed,” the judge continued. “Under the current Black Book Act, the answer to that question is no. The Wrongful Death of a Minor Act applies to all unborn children, regardless of where they live.”

“This applies without restriction to all children, born and unborn,” they wrote.

In a dissenting opinion, Justice Gregory Cook warned that the decision “almost certainly eliminates the creation of frozen embryos through in vitro fertilization (IVF) in Alabama,” a sentiment echoed by the Biden-Harris campaign. and criticized MAGA Republicans. “It involves them in the most personal decisions a family can make, from birth control to in vitro fertilization.” Additionally, the Biden-Harris campaign accused Republicans of “preventing loving couples from expanding their families.” is blaming.

“If Donald Trump is elected, there is no question that he will impose extreme anti-freedom policies on the entire country,” the Biden-Harris campaign said.

But Judge Tom Parker, who cited the Bible in a concurring opinion, said the Alabama state legislature has ruled that IVF is “barely regulated in the United States, and some commentators have compared it to legal regulation.” ” and explained that they could choose to legislate in the field of in vitro fertilization. Wild West of the United States. “

“For example, in Australia and New Zealand, prevailing ethical standards dictate that doctors typically create only one embryo at a time,” he wrote. Many critics of IVF point out the complex ethical issues it raises. Embryos and their effects can include experimentation, including selective abortion when a woman is pregnant with multiple babies but only wants one.

Parker pointed out that in vitro fertilization is allowed but regulated in other countries, which addresses many of the concerns of pro-life Republicans. For example, the majority of embryo transfers in Australia and New Zealand are performed one at a time.

Parker explained:

Regarding the related issue of embryo transfer (the process of implanting an embryo into the uterus), in Australia and New Zealand, over 90% of embryo transfers occur only once at a time. Similarly, European Union (“EU”) countries have legal limits on the number of embryos transferred in one cycle. In EU countries, 58% of embryo transfers contain only one embryo and 38% contain two embryos. Therefore, 96% of embryo transfers in EU countries involve no more than two transfers at a time.

Such restrictions on embryo creation and transfer necessarily reduce or eliminate the need for long-term embryo storage. Italy went a step further, banning the cryopreservation of embryos unless there are genuine health risks or force majeure that prevent them from being transferred immediately after their creation21. All these measures protect the life of the unborn child and still allow the couple to become parents.

Senate Republicans are urging candidates to openly support IVF without sounding “extreme” as the party feels the heat in the wake of the ruling.

“As a blessing to those who are trying to have children, please make your support for in vitro fertilization and fertility services clear,” said Jason Thieleman, executive director of the National Republican Senatorial Committee. . tell The candidates called on them to “publicly oppose any efforts to restrict access to IVF and other fertility treatments, and frame such opposition as a defense of family values ​​and personal freedom.” There is.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Reddit
Telegram
WhatsApp

Related News