Intelligence agencies are reportedly “nervous” about former President Donald Trump’s possible return to the White House and what it could mean for those who oppose him.
politician – News outlets published debunked articles suggesting Hunter Biden’s laptop was Russian disinformation – interviewed A group of 18 former bureaucrats and analysts who served as appointees or career bureaucrats in the vast bureaucracy, most of whom wish to anonymously attack President Trump “to avoid a backlash.” It is said that
of piece He quotes Trump critic Fiona Hill. He is a Russia analyst and former intelligence official who served under the George Bush and Barack Obama administrations, joined the Trump National Security Council from the liberal think tank Brookings Institution, and is also a holdover from the Obama administration. Served many times.
Hill, who just appeared on CBS News to criticize Trump, said: politiko:
He wants to weaponize intelligence services. And really, you have to look at it from a 360-degree perspective. He can’t pick and choose what he wants to hear when there are so many countries that are adversaries of the United States and don’t want America to be happy. …If he digs out information about one thing, he will partially blind us.
Critics and anonymous former officials warn that President Trump could “overhaul the nation’s spy agencies in a way that could lead to an unprecedented level of politicization of intelligence.” did. They warned that President Trump would “push even harder” than the first administration to purge those hostile to his political agenda.
meanwhile politiko He acknowledged that “American spy agencies have never been completely divorced from politics,” suggesting that this was only a problem under the Trump administration.
[A]The kind of overhaul that President Trump is expected to attempt could undermine the credibility of U.S. intelligence agencies at a time when the United States and its allies rely on them to navigate the crises in Ukraine and the Middle East. It also could effectively strip the intelligence community of its ability to dissuade the president from making decisions that could endanger the country.
politiko Also The bureau cited former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, who oversaw the launch of an investigation into collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia, based on an unvetted opposition investigation funded by the Hillary Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Convention. A debunked study claimed that President Trump participated in “golden shower” sex acts with prostitutes in Moscow. The document was then used as a “roadmap” for the FBI’s investigation into the Trump campaign.
McCabe tried to defend his attachment of his opponent’s research to intelligence documents briefed to then-President Barack Obama, but this served as a pretext for leaking the fake study to CNN, and shortly thereafter was leaked to BuzzFeed and disseminated to the public.
Subsequently, in response to the leak, FBI Director James Comey publicly acknowledged that the bureau had opened an investigation, and continued to investigate Trump until Special Counsel Robert Mueller found there was no criminal collusion or wrongdoing by the Trump campaign. It sparked a media frenzy throughout the administration.
Afterwards, Trump critics and former officials worried that Trump would appoint his own allies to intelligence positions (which every president has the right to do) and that they were inexperienced. .
In particular, this article focuses on Kash Patel, who has an extensive career as a former deputy director of national intelligence, chief of staff at the Department of Defense, counterterrorism director on the National Security Council, and senior aide to then-Chairman Devin Nunes of the House Intelligence Committee. It mentions “concerns” regarding Mr. (R-Calif.), former federal prosecutor and federal public defender who works on national security cases.
Kash Patel (Gage Skidmore/Flickr)
Although there is no evidence that he will reveal any sources or methods, the article notes that “Mr. Patel is likely to return to service under Mr. Trump if elected, and that he has There are growing concerns among current and former intelligence officials about preserving the methodology.” .
Finally, there were concerns that Trump’s re-election would erode trust with his Western intelligence partners.
“If Trump is elected, much of the rebuilt trust could evaporate overnight,” the article warned, without citing the source.
“If countries don’t trust us, we may become more blind than ever,” argued an anonymous former government official.
Follow Christina Wong on Breitbart News “X,” society of truth,or Facebook.
