A city program that reportedly provides free alcohol to homeless people across San Francisco has come under fire after a tech company CEO showed interest in the logic of toying with the addictions plaguing city residents. Bathing. new york post.
Adam Nathan, founder and CEO of an AI marketing company called Blaze and chairman of the Salvation Army San Francisco Metro Advisory Board, recently shared his concerns about this new program with It is written as follows. $1 million a year for a “managed alcohol program”? I stumbled across the building where this program is being held, providing free alcohol to homeless people suffering from chronic alcoholism. ”
Nathan’s X thread explained how the city implemented the program. write “The location was an old hotel in SOMA. They had kegs on taps in the lobby and they were basically handing out free beer to homeless people identified as having AUD (alcohol use disorder).”
“Are we going to use tax dollars to manage people’s addictions forever? That seems to be basically what we’re saying.”
Towards the end of Nathan’s thread, he answered the questionnaireasked his followers if they would agree to the city of San Francisco handing out free alcohol like candy to city residents. Of the approximately 13,700 users who voted, almost 81% said they disapproved of the move.
san francisco chronicle report The program, which started with just 10 beds, has served 55 clients, according to the Department of Public Health. The program currently has 20 beds for him and will ultimately cost about $5 million a year.
Nurses are told to administer certain amounts of vodka and beer to people participating in the program. The report states that the program focuses on participants’ overall health, not sobriety.
But Nathan isn’t the only one taking issue with this strange program. Mayor London Breed said in February that harm reduction “doesn’t alleviate the harm” and “makes it far worse.”
Breed’s move puts her at odds with her own public health agency, which maintains harm reduction is a cornerstone of the agency’s system of care.
Breed previously tried to open abstinence-only housing for formerly homeless people, but the proposal was withdrawn after backlash, according to the Chronicle.
“Are we going to use tax dollars to manage people’s addictions forever? That seems to be basically what we’re saying,” said Tom Wolfe, a recovering heroin abuser.
“I think you should use that money for detox and recovery.”
Do you like Blaze News? Avoid censorship and sign up for our newsletter to get articles like this delivered straight to your inbox. Register here!
