SELECT LANGUAGE BELOW

NYT Hides Fact Kamala’s Sole McDonald’s Witness Is Campaign Surrogate

extreme left new york times Found One “witness” vouching for Kamala Harris working at McDonald's concealed the fact that this so-called witness also happened to be a Harris campaign agent.

Over the weekend, times The group, a left-wing propaganda outlet that spreads fascism, conspiracy theories and anti-Semitism, wrote a ludicrous defense of the claims made by Kamala, who worked at McDonald's in the summer of 1983. I'll explain the absurdity later, but the most convincing one is: Part of the defense (also not very convincing, as I'll explain later) was Kamara's one witness. Here's how to do it times Presented this witness:

However, the New York Times interviewed be A friend who knew Harris when he was a teenager and stayed in touch with his family over the years.. Wanda Kagan, a close friend of Harris's who went to high school together in MontrealHe then remembered that Harris was working at McDonald's at the time.

In an emailed response to questions, Ms. Kagan said Ms. Harris' mother, who died in 2009, had approached Ms. Kagan several years ago about a summer job. Kagan said she herself worked at one of the fast food chain's many franchises at the time. [emphasis added]

According to the Washington Free Beacon, which first reported the story two months ago, the parts in bold are outright lies.

Look, times Mr. Kagan's description of Mr. Kagan as “a close friend of Ms. Harris's since they went to high school together” is intentionally misleading. of times I want you to believe that Kagan and Kamala were only friends in high school. In other words, if it's not true, why would someone with no agenda in Kamala's past suddenly show up 40 years later and vouch for her?

but.

Free beacons are: Found:

How times What she doesn't tell readers is that Ms. Kagan is a full-throated supporter of Ms. Harris, appearing alongside the vice president at several campaign events. She also represented her old friend on television during the Democratic National Convention.

Kagan also appeared on MSNBC in place of Harris.

Why such an obvious lack of integrity? times?

At best, these are lies of omission. why, times Is that a lie?

Related: Trump McTrolls Kamala! I worked “15 more minutes than Kamala'' at McDonald's

Trump War Room/X

I'll tell you why… times We know Kamala has been lying about her job this summer and is doing everything she can to run out the clock until Election Day. of times Also know that when the truth about Kagan gets published, her story becomes much less convincing.

Even taken at face value, Kagan's story is unconvincing. Let me tell you why.

Believe it or not, I also worked at McDonald's in 1983, the same year that Kamala “Stolen McVara” Harris wasn't working there. It's been 41 years and I can easily name a dozen people from the top to verify this fact. In my head, I had people who could vouch for me, people I worked with at the time, friends who knew I worked there.

But look at that gerbil. times Willing to eat for word salad kami:

The campaign did not make Harris' friends or family available for interviews about their memories of the experience.

There is no excuse for the Harris campaign not to produce witnesses. none. Trust me, if there is one, it will be available soon. and still times So unethical and partisan that they are willing to carry this water, even comparing Trump's perfectly reasonable skepticism to birtherism.

Things get even worse…take a big dose of this…

Like the birtherism conspiracy theory, this one puts Harris and her inner circle in a certain predicament. Tracking down pay stubs and other documents from far back in time would be a difficult task for almost anyone. McDonald's corporate representatives ignored media requests for supporting information. And trying to quash Trump's claims could give them life. [emphasis mine]

Again, the part in bold is a lie. Kamala Harris is the Vice President of the United States. All she has to do is call the IRS or Social Security Administration and get the documents. Even if Kamala's income was so low that she did not file a tax return, McDonald's would have paid her Social Security taxes. All it takes is a phone call.

It's really something to see something like this once respected outlet new york times This is how you degrade yourself.

RELATED: 'That's inappropriate' — Donald Trump claims 'lying Kamala' 'never worked at McDonald's'

sea ​​span

Please listen. new york times I don't hide behind a false shield of objectivity. I'm a partisan. Everyone knows who I support and what I believe in, but let me tell you one thing…

All things being the same, it's Trump who claims to have worked at McDonald's, not Kamala…Even if Trump asked me to write this story, I can't. You want me to defend your claim that you worked at McDonald's based on the words of your campaign agent? No, you won't tell me the names of several people you know who worked there, and you want me to attack you as a liar? No, please provide your social security information. I support you 100 percent, but don't try to make fun of me. Oh, and there's no way to hide the fact that your only witness is a campaign agent.

It's bad enough that these fake journalists are biased, but they have no pride in their work or themselves. You would have to be a greedy, immoral gerbil to put something this dishonest on your byline.

John Nolte's first and last novel. borrowed time, winning five star rave From daily readers. You can read an excerpt here and a detailed review here. Also available in hardcover And even more Kindle and audio book.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Reddit
Telegram
WhatsApp

Related News