SELECT LANGUAGE BELOW

Van Hollen Declares: Leaders Who Ignore the Constitution Are Unfit to Lead!

Van Hollen says leaders who don’t fight for Constitution don’t deserve to lead

Senator Chris Van Hollen (D-MD) contended that lawmakers from all parties must advocate for the constitution.

Van Hollen appeared on CNN’s “State of the Union” on Sunday, having just returned from a visit to El Salvador where he met with Maryland’s displaced individual, Kilmer Abrego Garcia.

His visit faced criticism from officials associated with the Trump administration and Republican Party, yet Democrats have received alerts that Abrego Garcia has been denied his right to a fair process, as the administration circumvents Supreme Court directives to facilitate his return.

Host Dana Bash questioned Van Hollen regarding the notion that the administration might use the battle over Abrego Garcia’s deportation as a diversion from its tariffs.

“I believe it’s important to advocate for one person’s constitutional rights because if we concede the rights of one, we jeopardize the rights of all,” he expressed.

“Many constituents, regardless of party affiliation, are fed up with the elected representatives and officials they care about,” Van Hollen remarked. “And I assert that anyone unwilling to advocate for the Constitution is unfit to lead.”

Initially, it was uncertain if Van Hollen would encounter Abrego Garcia during his El Salvador trip. They ultimately met on Friday, and the senator noted they were unaware of the conflict involving his family and the intense political discourse resulting from his deportation.

Van Hollen indicated that Abrego Garcia does not expect a ruling from the Supreme Court to facilitate his return. Nevertheless, the Trump administration has attempted to shift the responsibility for Abrego Garcia’s return to El Salvador, igniting a legal conflict between the executive branch and the judiciary.

“The core issue is that he and his administration oppose the court rulings mandating that Abrego Garcia be afforded due process,” Van Hollen stated. “They are trying to litigate what should be determined in court through social media.”

“They ought to either respect the court or remain silent,” he concluded.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Reddit
Telegram
WhatsApp

Related News