Duke Law Journal’s Controversial Admissions Practices

The Duke Law Journal has reportedly informed minority applicants about a bonus system for essays focused on their racial background, despite a Supreme Court ruling that prohibits such preferences in university admissions.

For the 2024 application cycle, the journal encouraged candidates to write personal statements highlighting how being part of an “underrepresented group” could contribute to “diverse voices.” An internal document revealed this suggestion and requested that those in the “affinity group” tied to law school identity keep the information confidential from other students.

Students affiliated with the group were told that holding a leadership position would earn them an extra 10 points on their essays regarding race, plus an additional 3 to 5 points. This points system raises questions about the implications of such strategies, especially in light of recent legal standards.

A note from the Duke Law Journal included instances of essays that successfully garnered these additional points. For example, one essay discussed perspectives gained from being an Asian American woman and the daughter of immigrants.

The Supreme Court ruled in June 2023 that considering race in enrollment policies is unconstitutional for universities receiving federal funds. Chief Justice John Roberts emphasized that universities cannot find loopholes to bypass this regulation.

Currently, the university is embroiled in lawsuits across several states, claiming discriminatory employment and scholarship practices under the guise of diversity initiatives. Additionally, the Department of Justice has stated its intent to investigate certain University of California campuses for potential violations of the Supreme Court’s ruling.

Efforts to navigate these complex legalities seem ongoing, and it raises concerns about universities adhering to the law moving forward.