An outspoken socialist who openly supports Palestine and has criticized America is on the brink of possibly becoming New York City’s mayor—this individual became an American citizen the same year that *The Incredibles 2* came out.
This raises questions about the effectiveness of our democracy. Are we really participating in a vibrant system, or is it being exploited by individuals who unravel its fabric with loopholes, slowly tightening the nation into a troubling state?
A line from *No Country for Old Men* keeps echoing in my mind: “If the rule you followed brought you to this, of what use was the rule?”
Zohran Mamdani’s policy proposals feel reminiscent of historical figures like Pol Pot, mixed with modern movements like BLM. He aims to base property taxes on race and aims to eliminate billionaires—it’s unclear whether he wants them to leave the country or if he has more drastic measures in mind. His vision includes redistributing wealth so that illegal immigrants can more easily navigate the high costs of living in New York.
He presents as a Marxist, perhaps cloaked in intersectionality; a younger version of AOC, with arguably fewer burdens. His goals align with long-standing communist ideals: dismantling the capitalist structure in America and reclaiming lands they believe have been unjustly taken.
The political right is understandably alarmed. There’s a sense of urgency—how did we reach this point? Is it due to his affable demeanor or perhaps his viral TikTok presence? Can current mayor Eric Adams counter him? Why do some white leftists consistently vote for what seems like their own downfall? Are they naïve, malicious, or maybe just influenced by an educational system that pushes certain narratives? And what does this imply for our nation?
This situation reflects the same flawed, corrupt system that grants citizenship to individuals like Mamdani—who expresses disdain for his new home—while simultaneously producing countless Americans who agree with his bleak critique of their country. Many white voters see themselves as part of the issue, and supporting someone like Mamdani becomes a means to escape feelings of guilt about their privilege.
Yet, his focus on the difficult reality for most New Yorkers, particularly those not in the upper class, resonates deeply. As Emily Jashinsky noted, when he talks about how people are “struggling to afford even a shred of dignity,” it strikes a chord, making many more open to new ideas.
The reality is, life in New York has become increasingly unaffordable under Democratic leadership—mayors, governors, city councils. Younger voters, frustrated with Republicans and unwilling to consider conservatives, naturally gravitate toward someone who promises to ease living costs. However, they often overlook that the policies of the very liberals they consistently elect have contributed to rising expenses through high taxes and ‘sustainable’ energy initiatives. Yet, they realize that traditional Democrats aren’t offering viable solutions.
They often find themselves aligning with a newcomer who pledges to take wealth from affluent demographics to redistribute it. What they might not recognize are the potential consequences of pursuing such an ideology to its logical extremes.
Fun fact: New York has always been a notoriously expensive city. I once lived there, and honestly, I wouldn’t go back now. While California has its faults, I do appreciate not being cramped in a tiny, overpriced apartment.
What does Mamdani’s candidacy mean to those outside the city? It becomes less about whether he succeeds or fails as mayor, and more about a seismic shift in politics. Regardless of the outcomes—rising prices, increasing crime—his election already disrupts the established order due to his ethnic background and success against a well-known political figure. It echoes Barack Obama’s rise back in 2008 and may serve as a blueprint for Democrats eager to regain momentum.
The search is already on for another political figure like Mamdani, perhaps someone born in the U.S. who could even aim for the presidency in subsequent election cycles. And if they find someone who misrepresents their eligibility, well, they might just secure the necessary documentation with a little help from a state employee.
In essence, New York City may have chosen a catalyst for significant change, and it’s not the harmless character of popular culture; it’s a force that could potentially invoke real threat and disruption.
