A Bar’s New Rule: No Solo Drinkers
A bar owner has implemented a ban on solo drinkers in an effort to “reduce the risk” associated with unaccompanied patrons—a move that’s been met with mixed reactions online.
Karl Peters, who owns Alibi in Altrincham, England, has established new guidelines aimed at fostering a safer environment at his popular venue. He took to Instagram to explain his rationale.
“It’s not safe. Our responsibility is to maintain our license, keep everyone safe, and minimize risks,” Peters emphasized. He mentioned encountering significant backlash regarding the newly enforced rules.
“I won’t apologize for prioritizing the safety of our guests. That’s our top priority,” he stated in a video shared earlier this month.
According to Peters, an incident outside the bar occurred with a disgruntled individual who reacted negatively to a sign stating, “No single entry allowed after 9pm.” This sign clearly lays out that solo patrons aren’t permitted after that hour.
Peters explained that many solo customers seem uncomfortable and can disrupt the experience for others. “I get that some don’t like this policy, but, honestly, that doesn’t concern me much. We often see intoxicated individuals wandering aimlessly at night,” he added.
Alibi, known for its karaoke and nightlife, initiated this policy partly to address potential medical emergencies when a patron might be alone. “It creates a difficult situation for us,” he said.
The intent behind this ruling is to cultivate a safer atmosphere for groups and protect the establishment from possible fines.
“Letting individuals in alone can lead to disruptive behavior since they might not have anyone to engage with,” Peters noted. “So, we’re simply creating boundaries. Unless you’re part of a group we recognize, you won’t be allowed in.”
Single guests outside the venue are encouraged to text the person they intend to meet before entry, or they won’t be admitted.
“It’s essential to keep everyone safe and manage our license effectively,” Peters reiterated. He also mentioned that while solo customers can still come, this policy kicks in at 9pm when the bar is usually busy.
The response to this policy has sparked debate online, with some supporting Peters while others advocate for a more nuanced approach. One commenter remarked, “It’s your place. Make the rules; if they don’t like it, too bad.” Meanwhile, another individual expressed appreciation for the policy, emphasizing “safety in numbers.” Yet, dissenting voices criticized the ban as “pathetic,” even sharing that they would avoid the bar entirely.
Some felt the ban on solo drinkers limits freedom, with someone arguing they enjoy their own company and don’t disturb others.





