Senate Republicans continue to back President Donald Trump’s approach towards Iran as the deadline for Congressional intervention looms. Recently, Republicans blocked another Democratic effort to end hostilities in the Middle East, just a day after Trump extended a fragile ceasefire, citing “deep divisions” within the Iranian leadership. Notably, a vote aimed at limiting the president’s war powers failed after 54 days of conflict.
There’s some uncertainty about whether a long-term peace deal can be struck. Lawmakers are increasingly worried about the costs, duration, and the ultimate resolution of the conflict. Senator Tammy Baldwin (D-Wis.) expressed her discontent, stating, “This war was simply a disaster. There is no reason for us to go back to war at full strength.”
Next week marks the 60-day threshold regarding Congress’s obligation to assess ongoing military actions under the War Powers Resolution. Despite this, Republicans seem steadfast, holding a united front against Democratic attempts to advance their resolution since the conflict began. There’s chatter among Democrats, however, about submitting six additional resolutions for a vote.
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer from New York emphasized their collective commitment by saying, “Our caucus is united and focused on ending the Iran war. And we will continue to vote on these resolutions over and over again.”
Interestingly, among Republican ranks, there are signs of divergence over whether to bring the Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) to the table. Senator Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) is reportedly working to create a draft of the AUMF that would allow Congress more oversight regarding future military developments in Iran.
Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) remarked, “We’re going to see what our conference’s intentions are and where our members are on this.” Some GOP senators, including Susan Collins of Maine, have voiced opposition to extending military actions beyond 60 days, prompting questions regarding the administration’s overall goals.
At a recent economic summit, Collins mentioned it was “very likely” she wouldn’t approve any extension of hostilities. She added her belief that, if military actions in Iran persist past the 60-day mark, the War Powers Act will necessitate the president seeking Congressional approval for continuation.
There are discussions about the financial implications of the conflict, particularly the current operational costs and future funding needs related to military supplies. Yet, the administration hasn’t submitted a formal request for funding, with lawmakers estimating potential expenses could range significantly—from $50 billion to $200 billion. Russ Vought, the Office of Management and Budget director, informed the Senate Budget Committee the request isn’t ready yet and refrained from giving a specific cost estimate.
“If you’re within the Department of the Army,” Vought stated, “these costs are going to vary from day to day, so I think it’s hard to give an average cost.”
