McFadden suggests that most people with severe disabilities do not need to reevaluate their PIP
Pat McFaddenMinister of the Cabinet Office suggested that one change announced today will prevent people with the most severely disabled from being reevaluated by PIP (individual independent payments – disability benefits).
in Report The era, Chris Smith It states that the current reassessment process (when PIP qualifications are reviewed and see if it needs to continue) will be changed. He reports:
It is understood that those with no prospect of improvement are told that PIPS is guaranteed and there is no need to be reevaluated. Rather than a list of conditions, this applies to per-case or worsening disorders.
However, for those with other conditions [Liz] Kendall is expected to show more frequent reassessment. Currently, claimants have received awards of up to 10 years, but there are no clear rules as to when they will be re-evaluated. The Minister hopes for a significant increase. It remains unclear whether more reviews will be face-to-face. The switch to remote ratings since Covid has been proposed as a reason for more people to remain instead of being reduced.
Kendall hinted at supporting this approach at the Commons yesterday.
You are asked if you need to evaluate the most strict people over and over again McFadden I said to BBC's breakfast:
I don't want to pre-precede what happens to the announcement, but I think it might be a progressively degenerate state for people in situations where it is clear that they are unable to work and never get better.
And obviously, you're not going to treat someone in that situation the same as someone who can get into work with a little support.
Pat McFadden defends the cuts in benefits for people with disabilities, saying, “We cannot do things that require taxes and reform the nation.”
good morning. There is nothing permanent in politics. This year marks the 10th anniversary of Jeremy Corbyn's election as labor leader, and will be held at the contest that Liz Kendall, considered a right-wing Blairright candidate, came last with a humiliating 4.5%. Morgan McSweeney, who managed the campaign, now runs the country more or less, as PM's chief of staff.
Here's our one-night preview story Pippa Kreler, Heather Stewart and Jessica Ergott.
Yesterday, Labour Left Diane Abbott said the government should introduce wealth tax instead. Sharon GrahamGeneral Secretary of Unity has made similar arguments. Daily Mirror Articles. She says:
It's not like the society we want to live in. Whether it's winter fuel cuts, we're considering taking pips from people with disabilities, or why we're making these types of decisions.
Why are we making those decisions before we see things like profit tax, before we see things like wealth tax? The 50 wealthiest families in the UK are worth £500 million. That's the same as half of British wealth. That's the same as the 33 million people in the UK.
Corbinite is not the only one who thinks this way. Last week, in an interview with Matt Forde's political party podcasthere57:30m in.), but he does not advocate for wealth tax at all, Alastair Campbell I described it as a rational policy “hard choice” rather than a wild left-wing fantasy.
this morning Pat McFaddenMinisters of the Cabinet Office have conducted interviews. Reflecting the lines used by Downing Street yesterday, he said the changes announced today are aimed not only to save money, but also to fix a broken system in which sick people may be trapped in benefits when it is better to return to work. He asked why the government doesn't just tax the rich more, he replied:
Well, those who say it will always say it [find the money] Other places.
There is a progressive tax system. The top 1% pay about one-third of taxes.
Ultimately, I don't think you can get out of the need to reform the nation and rent your path.
The Prime Minister spoke in a massive speech last week about national reform. We are reforming the nation in one or more ways, and part of the essential reform of the nation is to ensure that the welfare state we believe as a party is suitable for the 21st century.
And we can't sit and relax. Literally millions of people are moving towards these benefits with little or no hope for future work.
(The figures about the top 1% paying one-third of McFadden's tax This applies to income tax percentages They pay, but not the figure of the overall share of tax burden. )
In an interview, McFadden also claimed that the cabinet is fully in favor of Kendall's plan. “Yes, I think Cabinets are united behind taking on the issue of the growing benefits bill,” he told Times Radio.
Today it is controlled by the publication of illness and disability. Chemibedenok beginning. This is another example of what is not permanent in politics. Six years ago, a conservative government Passed law It will be a legally binding purpose to reduce carbon footprint to net zero by 2050. There was a strong cross-party consensus in favor of the target. Today, Badenok is dismantling it, with a speech saying, “Zero Zero Is Not possible by 2050.”
This is the agenda for the day.
9:30am: Keir Starmer Chairs Cabinet.
10:30am: Kemi Badenoch will give a speech launching the Conservative Party's policy update program.
11:30am: Downing Street hosts lobby briefings.
11:30am: Energy Secretary Ed Miliband asks questions at the Commons.
morning: Foreign Secretary David Lamy meets Kaja Karas, the EU Foreign Secretary in London.
After 12:30pm: Liz Kendall, secretary of work and pensions, will make a statement to lawmakers about a green paper on changes in the benefits of illness and disability.
If you would like to contact me, please post a message under the line or message me on social media. I can't read all the messages BTL, but if I put “Andrew” in a message directed at me, I'm more likely to see it because I search for posts that contain that word.
If you want to flag something urgently, it's best to use social media. You can contact me on Bluesky at @AndrewsParrowgdn. The Guardian has given up on posting from X's official account, but individual Guardian journalists are there. I still have an account. I'll send a message to me with @andrewsparrow and look at it and respond if necessary.
When readers point out mistakes, I think it's very helpful. The error is too small to fix. And I think your question is also very interesting. I can't promise to reply to all of them, but I try to reply to as many things as I can on BTL or sometimes blogging.
