A new bipartisan bill aimed at protecting children under the age of 13 from harmful content of social media YouTube childrenParents' rights of the parent's rights warning that minors are still supplying transgender ideology and DEI videos.
The custody defenders who talked to the Fox News Digital suggested that this scale constitutes “too much of the government”, with a problem with the bill, removing children from the social media law over the restrictions of algorithms. Masu.
This bill will be introduced by Senator Brian Shagles, D-Hawaii, Ted Cruise, R-Texas, Chris Murphy, D-Connia, and Katie Brit (R-ALA.) It is planned. In the online question and answer fact sheet, the Schatz office does not comply with the definition of social media under the bill under the bill, but also video games, wireless messaging, educational platform, telecon fence, etc. He said that the platform is not the same.
If you access the YouTube Kids site, you will be asked to judge whether you are a parent or child. It tells you that you have to set an account for your child and you can block videos and channels you don't like. Content that can be used by children on the site includes videos created by the “Quia” creator, such as account quia kid staff, Nicolodone, and CBC kids news. Other popular videos are the center of DEI, such as explaining “systematic racism” to children.
When another state order ends in a “awakened virus”, the closing of the DEI office at the university will be accumulated.
Social media applications are grouped into mobile devices. (JAAP Arriens/nurphoto via Getty Images)
“We don't just exclude apps from scrutiny because they say children, so we know, we all are familiar with the so -called gender. Tiffany Justice, a co -founder of Liberty, has learned that wetube children have not relieved our fears.
“What we have seen to the children of YouTube is evidence that I have seen myself personally. It's evidence that transgender ideology is supplied to children,” she explained. “I know that a transformer is targeting a child. I know that there are vulnerable children to see this content. I often click it. I just don't want my parents to tell me. For children, everything is OK.
“We've always said that, mom for freedom, we won't be a joint parent with the government.” “So I want to keep telling my parents that they really need to be involved. They need them.”
“There is a tide wave with a disability in the United States, which indicates that care to affirm so -called gender is bad for children,” he said. “We don't want the children to be born in the wrong body and do not want them to be educated. This is a terrible message. Stopping the child's natural and healthy development is a crime. Gender, gender. The content of children about ideology or day is very concerned.
YouTube Spokesman, who reached Fox News Digital, defended the YouTube Kids app, but did not deal with legislative proposals directly.
“The YouTube Kids app puts your parents in the driver's seat,” said Spokesman. “Parents can select what their children are looking and invisible. Control the content they see, curate the list of approved channels, or have approved content from the child's profile. Can be blocked.
On the other hand, the judge, on the other hand, was introduced by Senator R-Utah to protect children online, including one bill introduced a last session that requires age verification on the App Store. I emphasized.
LEE has not been listed as a joint sponsor of social media platforms that prohibits social media platforms under the age of 13 from creating or maintaining social media accounts, but includes their parents' consent. Not. The bill does not require users to present government IDs to access social media. Instead, social media companies require user data, such as posting photos, following channels, and dates required to sign up. Judge whether your child is on your platform.
The YouTube Kids logo is displayed on the mobile phone screen. (Faisal Bashir/Sopa Images/Lightrocket Via Getty Images)
Regarding the other aspects of the Social Media Off Off Social Media Law, justice is concerned that the bill bans “algorithm boost” for children under the age of 17. Under the bill, social media platform cannot track accurate periods using machine learning. Children are looking at what they post and click to learn the reasons why each child stays for the longest on the platform.
Shales' office claimed that social media companies would use their children for profit, but justice stated that her main concern was that the government dominated the algorithm.
After the research, the therapist's sound alarm shows a dramatic rise in gender violation among children.
“If your son likes hockey and provides more hockey information to you, I don't know that it will bother me,” she says she goes to her child's social media account. He explained that he had met his fellow mom, and he “trained” algorithms by raising more conservative political content, as her teenager is exposed to another perspective other than the mainstream media.
“I think there are many questions about who controls the algorithm,” said justice. “We know that there are many very dangerous content that can affect your child's mental health. There is evidence, so how the algorithm is used. I want the government to make a decision for my family.
Cat Parks, a former vice -chairman of Texas GOP, another custody, is in Fox News Digital, and her main concerns about social media children are that “parents need to be the ultimate authority. “The real problem here is not the government, but for the children,” said Parks. It is the parent that you need to notify you so that you can get it. ”
“As a parent, I am deeply involved in my son's online presence and approves a platform that has allowed him to exchange. I can select and access him as a parent. Parks will give a feed to make a decision. “
The logo of the YouTube app is displayed on the Apple Store's iPhone. (Sheldon Cooper/Sopa Images/Lightrocket Via Getty Images)
Justice argued that parents were responsible for protecting the children from harmful content, and that the government might have a role in the government, but argued that it was really ambiguous about what would happen.
“We know that algorithm is addicted,” she said. “I know that I want to keep scrolling and supply information that I am interested in to more information. It's a transgender ideology, gender ideology. We work to wipe out it. So I hope that type of content is so common.
“I don't want the government to be my child's dad,” she added. “They have a father, he is a wonderful person, and we make good decisions for the children together.”
Most apps have age restrictions, but Shaz's office has quoted a 2023 -in -UK regulation survey, which found that nearly 40 % of the 8-12 -year -old children use social media platforms. 。
In a question and answer document, the Shaiz's office also stated that the bill does not hinder the lgbtq+young people online.
Click here to get the Fox News app
“We have created this law so that this bill does not adversely affect the community,” said the fact seat. “Under this bill, children can still find content positively and display the information in the order of age. In addition, this bill includes non -profit organizations, direct messaging, and teleconfality services. It does not affect the access to platforms such as websites.
Daniel Wallace is the news and political reporter of Fox News Digital. Story hints can be sent to [email protected]. @danimwallace。