New Gaza organization criticized for highlighting shortcomings of UN-supported aid systems

Gaza Humanitarian Foundation Distributes Tens of Millions of Meals

The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) has provided about 70 million meals to residents of Gaza since May, thanks to backing from the US and Israel. However, its delivery efforts face ongoing criticism and attacks from Hamas and, surprisingly, major global aid organizations.

Recently, UNRWA’s Phillip Lazzarini called for the termination of the GHF’s operations, labeling the foundation’s efforts as harmful. He described their actions as “hate.”

A letter signed by 230 non-governmental organizations (NGOs), including prominent ones like Amnesty International and Oxfam, criticized the GHF. They are advocating for a return to a UN-led aid distribution system.

New US-Backed Aid Delivery System

Some experts argue that the established relationship between UNRWA and Hamas jeopardizes its credibility, particularly as GHF appears to be effectively operating outside the traditional aid frameworks.

Gerald Steinberg, of NGO Monitor, pointed out that various groups are promoting negative narratives about the GHF, stating they have substantial resources to challenge its legitimacy.

Steinberg believes that the GHF demonstrates that aid can be delivered without relying on the conventional and, as he puts it, “corrupt” $1 billion aid system associated with UN agencies like UNRWA.

According to him, the opposition is attempting to undermine the GHF’s work through misinformation and pressure tactics.

Ongoing Challenges for GHF

John Acree, GHF’s interim executive director, responded to the criticisms, saying there’s no ill will toward the NGOs that signed the letter. He emphasized the GHF’s desire for collaboration, urging other groups to join their mission.

Since the GHF began its operation, it has encountered multiple challenges, including accusations of violence at distribution sites. UNRWA representatives asserted that the current aid system has led to tragic incidents, including the deaths of numerous individuals since May 28.

Lazzarini reiterated his concerns, claiming that the alternative aid mechanism may inadvertently lead to increased suffering for the people of Gaza.

In the midst of the controversy, the GHF issued a statement defending its efforts, attributing some negative reports to misinformation from the Hamas-aligned Gaza Ministry of Health. They urged the international community to take a closer look at these claims.

Hamas has vocally opposed the GHF’s activities, stating that the foundation undermines their control over aid distribution in Gaza. As a result, security for GHF personnel has become a pressing issue, with reports of fatalities among their staff.

Acree noted that despite the initial despair among Gazans, many have expressed gratitude for receiving aid without the expectation of payment, contrasting past experiences. He voiced a need for more partnerships, particularly with UN agencies and NGOs, to enhance the organization’s capacity to provide support.