A recent article in New York Magazine, which aimed to highlight Arab and Islamic culture in New York City, has faced significant backlash. Critics argue that it instead focused on the alleged “genocide” of Palestinians by Israel, even referring to Israel as “the landmass now called Israel.” This has led to a wave of subscription cancellations, as insiders reveal troubling practices behind the magazine’s editorial decisions.
The cover story, titled “Habibi City,” has been condemned for minimizing the Jewish presence in Arab-influenced areas, with many sources expressing outrage at what they see as a blatant dismissal of Jewish ties to these communities. The timing of the piece is particularly sensitive given the rise in hate crimes against Jews, with over half of the reported incidents targeting Jewish residents in New York under Mayor Zoran Mamdani’s leadership.
The article described a cultural scene in the Southwest Asian and North African communities, claiming it’s unified by shared values, yet it was criticized for framing this cultural moment purely as a response to the violence that erupted after October 7. Detractors point out that it largely ignored the murder of 1,200 people and the kidnappings that occurred that day, shifting focus instead to Israel’s actions.
Journalist Jordana Horn expressed her disappointment, saying, “I cannot support a magazine that denies Jewish history and identity.” In her subscription cancellation, she stated that the publication was contributing to anti-Semitic sentiments in the city.
Jewish groups have also expressed indignation over the portrayal of author Zaina Arafat’s work, which they view as sympathetic towards those facing xenophobia while drawing unsubstantiated comparisons between Zionism and various forms of hatred. They argue that such an approach erases the significance of Zionism to many Jews, who see it as a claim to their right to self-determination.
The “End Jew Hatred” organization criticized the article for sidelining Jewish voices and portraying their identity through a politically charged lens. They pointed out that using the term “threat of extermination” without evidence fails to consider ongoing threats to Jewish communities from groups like Hamas and others.
Pro-Israel activist Yalden Greenspan echoed this sentiment, stating that the magazine seemed more focused on defining who “counts” as Middle Eastern, neglecting the Jewish experience in the region. Abraham Hamra, a Syrian-born Jew and immigration lawyer, voiced his frustration as well, arguing that such exclusion is a major oversight for a publication that claims to champion diversity and social justice.
In an apparent effort to expand its cultural narrative, New York Magazine also highlighted Ayat, a restaurant that promotes what it terms genuine “Palestinian soul food.” Critics note that this portrayal arguably contributes to a cultural erasure that has deeper historical roots. One angry consultant remarked on the poor handling of the topic, referencing their experiences with food writers and how the piece overlooked Jewish contributions to Middle Eastern cuisine.
While some former writers and contributors, like Eve Barlow, lament the magazine’s handling of Jewish issues, they also recounted their disillusionment with the organization. Barlow noted that she was once praised for her work but was abruptly ignored when she spoke out against perceived biases.
Overall, New York Magazine’s recent editorial choices have led to sharp criticism, drawing attention to broader issues of representation and accuracy in cultural discussions. The magazine’s readership has been declining, and the fallout from this article may further impact its standing. Tablet Magazine quipped that to disagree with the article’s implications about Israel is to be viewed as an outsider in this narrative.
The Post has sought comments from New York Magazine regarding these unfolding events.
