The New York Times recently highlighted the surprising popularity of Christian cross necklaces, prompting a mix of amusement and confusion on social media. Many users reacted incredulously, pointing out that crosses have been worn as jewelry for ages, with notable figures sporting them long before the crucifixion of Jesus Christ.
In an article by Misty White Sidell, she noted that the cross necklace has become a frequent sight on television, especially around the necks of public figures like White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt and Attorney General Pam Bondi. This observation didn’t go unnoticed, with critics quickly taking to social media to mock the Times for what they perceived as a lack of awareness.
One commentator, Mary Catherine Hamm, exclaimed, “This is real. People wear crosses, and NYT is just discovering this.” Another user, Erika Sangie, remarked that wearing crosses is common, noting that even her Italian relatives have done so for generations. Charles CW Cooke from the National Review expressed disbelief that the Times could publish the piece without questioning the obviousness of the trend.
Tom Bevan from RealClearPolitics suggested that the author likely doesn’t know anyone who wears crosses, which might explain the novelty framing of the article. Overall, the reaction showcases a disconnect between the publication’s perspective and that of many readers. Even Professor Charlie Camothy remarked on the unusual context in which such common expressions of faith are viewed as noteworthy, which has sparked broader discussions about cultural representation in media.
Despite facing criticism in the past, this article adds to a narrative where even the most basic cultural symbols seem to be, well, a bit out of touch.
