The U.S. Supreme Court has denied a request by the Missouri Attorney General to stay the sentence and lift censorship restrictions imposed on former President Donald Trump in connection with his so-called hush money trial in New York state.
In early July, Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey, a Republican appointee currently seeking an unfulfilled term, effectively sued the state of New York, alleging that the state attempted to prevent Missourians from hearing anything the 2024 Republican presidential candidate said, citing a gag order that remained in effect even after a New York jury convicted Trump on all 34 charges related to payments made to cover up his alleged affair with porn star Stormy Daniels from the tabloids in 2016.
“I will continue my lawsuit against @KamalaHarris @JoeBiden’s Department of Justice for orchestrating the unlawful prosecution of President Trump.”
“New York is trying to hijack our national election and put President Trump in jail,” Bailey said. Tweeted “Missouris want to make sure that doesn’t happen.”
Acting Judge Juan Merchan relaxed the gag order after Trump was convicted, allowing him to criticize jurors and witnesses in the case, but he is still barred from speaking about prosecutors or their families.
Last week, a New York appeals court denied a motion by Trump, who was recently shot and nearly killed in an assassination attempt, to lift the remaining restrictions, citing ongoing claims that DA staff were receiving “intimidation” after the jury verdict continued. There have been no reports of physical harm to court staff as a result of the trial.
Republican attorneys general from Alaska, Florida, Iowa, and Montana all joined Bailey and Missouri in filing lawsuits with the Supreme Court, but NBC News Still, he called it a “huge failure.” Politico “A legal Hail Mary.”
Thus, on Monday, the Supreme Court One-page statement Bailey’s motion was denied.
“Missouri’s motion for leave to file a complaint is denied, and the motions for interim relief or stay of execution are denied as moot,” the statement said.
The statement added that Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas would have given Bailey an opportunity to present his case but would not have granted him the “other relief” he sought.
Following the Supreme Court’s statement, Bailey expressed disappointment and said the Biden-Harris administration “Legal warfare“
“It is unfortunate that the Supreme Court has refused to exercise its constitutional responsibility to resolve state-vs-state disputes,” Bailey wrote.I will continue the lawsuit. Kamala Harris@JoeBiden“We condemn the Department of Justice for orchestrating the unlawful prosecution of President Trump.”
“The fight is not over yet”
New York Attorney General Letitia James said, Campaigned for election He has vowed to target President Trump and declined NBC News’ request for comment on the Supreme Court’s statement.
Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg There is a connection Trump, who is friends with billionaire investor George Soros and made trolling him a central part of his campaign, declined Politico’s request for comment.
Following his conviction, Trump was initially scheduled to be sentenced in July, but the sentencing hearing was later postponed to September.
Like Blaze News? Bypass the censorship and sign up for our newsletter to receive stories like this directly to your inbox. Register here!
